Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics

Bibliographic Data

ID5775469
AuthorsPeter Ludlow (0000-0003-3489-7365, corresponding author)
Year2011
Pages220
Publication date2011-02-03
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueThe philosophy of generative linguistics (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258536.001.0001
OpenAlexW1523560776
Open LibraryOL24896858M
ISBN9780199258536
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited12

This work explores some of the many interesting philosophical issues that arise in the conduct of generative linguistics. There are three basic themes that are woven throughout the work. The first theme is that generative linguistics at its best is concerned with understanding and explanation, and not just with observation and data gathering. Generative linguistics is interested in underlying mechanisms that give rise to language related phenomena, and this interest will often trump the goal of accumulating more data. The second theme is the Ψ-language hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the underlying mechanisms posited by generative linguists are fundamentally psychological mechanisms and that generative linguistics is a branch of cognitive psychology, but that it doesn't follow that cognitive psychology must therefore be interested in psychological states individuated narrowly. It is consistent with the Ψ-language hypothesis that psychological states are individuated in part by the embedding environment. The third theme is the principle of methodological minimalism. It is the thesis that best theory criteria like simplicity and formal rigor all really come down to one thing: seek methods that help linguists to do their jobs effectively and with the minimal of cognitive labor

Minimalism (technical communication · Minimalist program · Theme (computing · Transformational grammar · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Generative grammar · Language and languages · Philosophy

  • Meaning Diminished

    Kenneth A Taylor•Meaning Diminished•2019

  • Algumas Reflexões Sobre a Linguística Gerativa, Sua Evolução, Seus Avanços E Métodos

    Open Access•José Ferrari Neto, Adriano Marques Da Silva et al.•Gragoatá•2015

  • Is the ontology of biolinguistics coherent

    Open Access•Christina Behme•Language Sciences•2015

  • Ambiguity and explanation

    Jonathan L Shaheen•Inquiry•2017

  • What Is It To Have A Language

    Open Access•David Balcarras•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Is meaning cognized

    Open Access•David Balcarras•Mind & Language•2023

  • Troubles with Rey's linguistic Eliminativism

    Open Access•Robert J Stainton, Christopher Viger•Mind & Language•2022

  • A pluralistic theory of wordhood

    Open Access•Luca Gasparri•Mind & Language•2021

  • Explaining Away Kripke’s Wittgenstein

    Open Access•Derek Green•Erkenntnis•2023

  • One argument, many interpretations

    Christopher Vogel•Inquiry•2025

  • Concepts and conceptual engineering

    Ryan Nefdt, Ryan M Nefdt•Inquiry•2024

  • Analysis and falsifiability in practice

    Adam J R Tallman•Theoretical Linguistics•2021

  • Functionalism and tacit knowledge of grammar

    Open Access•David Balcarras•Philosophical Perspectives•2023

  • Hearing meanings

    Open Access•Luca Gasparri, Michael Murez•Synthese•2021

  • Compositionality as weak supervenience

    Open Access•Toby Napoletano•Synthese•2015

  • A slugfest of intuitions

    Open Access•Nat Hansen•Synthese•2013

  • Infinity and the foundations of linguistics

    Open Access•Ryan Nefdt, Ryan M Nefdt•Synthese•2019

  • Empirical significance, predictive power, and explication

    Open Access•Jonathan Surovell•Synthese•2019

  • Simplicity of what? A case study from generative linguistics

    Open Access•Giulia Terzian, María Inés Corbalán•Synthese•2021

  • Simple is not easy

    Open Access•Eduardo Barrios•Synthese•2016

  • Justifying the evidential use of linguistic intuitions

    Open Access•Karen Brøcker•Synthese•2021

  • A ‘Galilean’ science of language

    Open Access•Christina Behme•Journal of Linguistics•2014

  • Disagreement, Error, and an Alternative to Reference Magnetism

    Timothy Sundell•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2011

  • In defense of a "grammar" in the visual language of comics

    Open Access•Neil Cohn•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Linguistic Intuitions

    Open Access•Jeffrey Maynes, Steven Gro•Philosophy Compass•2013

  • Essays on form and interpretation

    Noam Chomsky•Essays on form and interpretation•1977

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • Semantic Interpretation In Generative Grammar

    Ray S Jackendoff•Semantic Interpretation In…•1974

  • Responses to Language

    Howard Maclay, Mary D Sleator•International Journal of American…•1960

  • Philosophical investigations

    Ludwig Wittgenstein•Philosophical investigations•1974

  • New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind

    Open Access•Noam Chomsky, Neil Smith•New Horizons in the Study of…•2000

  • Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability

    Open Access•N J Spencer•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1973

  • The interface of language and Theory of Mind

    Open Access•Jill De Villiers•Lingua•2007

  • A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language

    Michael B Kac, Mitchell P Marcus•Language•1982

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Unique citing works25
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2011 - 2025 (15)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae