Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bad Beliefs

Why They Happen to Good People

Bibliographic Data

ID5827742
AuthorsN Levy (0000-0002-5679-1986, Oxford University Press (United Kingdom), corresponding author)
Year2021
Pages208
Publication date2021-12-09
Open AccessYes
TypeBOOK
VenueBad Beliefs (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780192895325.001.0001
OpenAlexW4200366103
Open LibraryOL33955052M
ISBN9780192895325
LanguageEN
Citations received71
References cited149

Why do people come to reject climate science or the safety and efficacy of vaccines, in defiance of the scientific consensus? A popular view explains bad beliefs like these as resulting from a range of biases that together ensure that human beings fall short of being genuinely rational animals. This book presents an alternative account. It argues that bad beliefs arise from genuinely rational processes. We've missed the rationality of bad beliefs because we've failed to recognize the ubiquity of the higher-order evidence that shapes beliefs, and the rationality of being guided by this evidence. The book argues that attention to higher-order evidence should lead us to rethink both how minds are best changed and the ethics of changing them: we should come to see that nudging-at least usually-changes belief (and behavior) by presenting rational agents with genuine evidence, and is therefore fully respectful of intellectual agency. We needn't rethink Enlightenment ideals of intellectual autonomy and rationality, but we should reshape them to take account of our deeply social epistemic agency

Agency (philosophy) · Autonomy · Economics · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Order (exchange) · Political science · Positive economics · Rationality · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • AI Personalized Learning and the Risk of Epistemic Consolidation

    Open Access•Nicolas J Tanchuk•Studies in Philosophy and Education•2026

  • Is It Virtuous to Love Truth and Hate Falsehood

    Open Access•David Coady•Philosophies•2023

  • Believing in Shmeliefs

    Open Access•N Levy•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2024

  • The skeptical import of motivated reasoning

    Open Access•Maarten Van Doorn•Thinking & Reasoning•2024

  • Vice, Skill, and the Non-Ideal

    Open Access•Taylor Matthews•International Journal of…•2025

  • Non-Ideal Epistemology and Vices of Attention

    Open Access•N Levy•International Journal of…•2024

  • Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory in Epistemology

    Roseanne Mckenna, Gerry Dunne•International Journal of…•2025

  • Bad beliefs

    Daniel Williams•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • The (higher-order) evidential significance of attention and trust—comments on Levy’s Bad Beliefs

    Open Access•Catarina Dutilh Novaes•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Nothing about collective irrationalities makes sense except in the light of cooperation

    Open Access•Stefaan Blancke•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • An overview on trust and trustworthiness

    Elisabetta Lalumera•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • A Journey into the Mind

    Lisa Bortolotti, Lynn Chiu et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • What is left of irrationality

    Kathleen Murphy-Hollies, Chiara Caporuscio•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Vaccine hesitancy and the reluctance to “tempt fate”

    Anna Ichino•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • A tragic coalition of the rational and irrational

    Open Access•Marinus Ferreira, Marc Cheong et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Bad beliefs

    Stephen Gadsby•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Misinformation, observational equivalence and the possibility of rationality

    Open Access•Maarten Van Doorn•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • In need of the general public’s participation in science

    Rie Iizuka, Chie Kobayashi•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Doing your own research and other impossible acts of epistemic superheroism

    Andrew Buzzell, Regina Rini•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • Exempting Oneself from Knowing Better. Epistemic Laziness and Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Dominik Jarczewski•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Introduction to the Special Issue

    Charles Lassiter, Sarah B Trasmundi•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Trusting Conspiracy Theories

    Dean Joseph•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Against Intellectual Autonomy

    Open Access•N Levy•Social Epistemology•2024

  • No Trespassing! Abandoning the Novice/Expert Problem

    Open Access•N Levy•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Epistemic Libertarian Paternalism

    Open Access•Kengo Miyazono•Erkenntnis•2024

  • Conspiracy Beliefs and Monothematic Delusions

    Open Access•Anna Ichino, Ema Sullivan-Bissett•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Epistemic Hypocrisy and Standing to Blame

    Open Access•Adam Piovarchy•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Betting on Conspiracy

    Open Access•Melina Tsapos•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Knowledge About Skepticism

    Open Access•N Levy•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Self‐Trust, Social Roles, and Autonomy

    Open Access•Amy Mullin, SuddhaSatwa GuhaRoy•Journal of Social Philosophy•2026

  • The Ethics and Epistemology of Persuasion

    Open Access•Roseanne Mckenna•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Too humble for words

    Open Access•N Levy•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Epistemic Health, Epistemic Immunity and Epistemic Inoculation

    Open Access•Adam Piovarchy, Scott Siskind•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Testimonial liberalism and the balance of epistemic goals

    Open Access•Ross F Patrizio•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • Advancing the debate on the consequences of misinformation

    Open Access•Maarten Van Doorn•Inquiry•2023

  • How conspiratorial beliefs spread, and how real conspiracies are covered up

    Open Access•Catarina Dutilh Novaes•Inquiry•2025

  • Genealogical undermining for conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier•Inquiry•2023

  • Distributed Truth-Telling

    Open Access•Nicolas J Bullot, Stephen W Enciso•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2026

  • Nihilistic Distrust

    Open Access•Cayla Clinkenbeard•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • On Meta-Expertise, Dissent and Epistemic Trespassing

    Open Access•Doan Q C Vu Duc, Quentin Hiernaux et al.•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Making Sense of Science Denialism

    Alexandre Billon•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Arrogancia, desconfianza y desafección. Una aproximación desde la epistemología de la virtud

    Open Access•Gonzalo Velasco Arias•Isegoría•2024

  • Reflexive Green Nationalism (RGN)

    Open Access•Lorenzo Posocco, I Watson•Frontiers in Sociology•2022

  • Echo Chambers and Friendship

    Open Access•Alper Güngör•EPISTÉMÈ•2023

  • Manufacturing the Illusion of Epistemic Trustworthiness

    Open Access•Tyler Porter•EPISTÉMÈ•2024

  • What are ‘biohackers’ hacking? Identifying motivations and meaning-making frameworks

    Open Access•Victoria Lorrimar•Medical Humanities•2025

  • Should Hostile Design Be Used To Prevent Begging, Loitering, and Rough Sleeping

    Open Access•Sebastian Jon Holmen•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2025

  • Could the Social Studies Curriculum be Expanded for Families

    Arda Eren, Ercenk Hamarat•The Social Studies•2025

  • Ideology as modes of being-with

    Open Access•Matthew Burch, Niclas Rautenberg•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2024

  • Do conspiracy-theory interventions rest on a mistake

    Open Access•Mark Colyvan, Tim Smartt et al.•Synthese•2025

  • A group identification account of collective epistemic vices

    Open Access•Kengo Miyazono, Rie Iizuka•Synthese•2023

  • Bad polarization in structurally cohesive communities

    Open Access•Matteo Michelini, Eugenia Polizzi Di Sorrentino et al.•Synthese•2025

  • Monothematic delusions are misfunctioning beliefs

    Open Access•Ema Sullivan-Bissett•Synthese•2024

  • Higher-order misinformation

    Open Access•Keith Raymond Harris•Synthese•2024

  • Motivational pessimism and motivated cognition

    Open Access•Stephen Gadsby•Synthese•2024

  • Precedent and rest stop convergence in reflective equilibrium

    Open Access•Bert Baumgaertner, Charles Lassiter•Synthese•2024

  • The case for partisan motivated reasoning

    Open Access•D Williams•Synthese•2023

  • Contrarianism, conspiracy theories, and epistemic forgeries

    Open Access•J C M Duetz•Synthese•2025

  • Virtue environmentalism

    Open Access•Dominik Jarczewski•Synthese•2025

  • Bad social norms rather than bad believers

    Open Access•Basil Müller•Synthese•2024

  • Taking the public seriously

    Open Access•Silvia Ivani, Alex Archer et al.•Synthese•2024

  • How to talk back

    Open Access•Rachel Fraser•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2023

  • Violations of Argumentation Standards in Contemporary Debates on Health and Reproductive Rights

    Open Access•Blas Radi, Claudio Cormick•Alternatives Global Local Political•2026

  • The Transmission of Cumulative Cultural Knowledge — Towards a Social Epistemology of Non-Testimonial Cultural Learning

    Open Access•Basil Müller•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Misplaced Trust in Expertise

    Michel Croce, Neri Marsili•Social Epistemology•2025

  • How Partisanship Can Moderate the Influence of Communicated Information on the Beliefs of Agents Aiming to Form True Beliefs

    Open Access•Maarten Van Doorn•Social Epistemology•2024

  • On associating (politically) with the unreasonable

    Open Access•Paul Garofalo•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2024

  • Identity-protective reasoning

    Open Access•Carolina Flores•EPISTÉMÈ•2025

  • It’s Our Epistemic Environment, Not Our Attitude Toward Truth, That Matters

    Open Access•N Levy•Critical Review•2023

  • On Literary Miracles and Social Credibility

    Open Access•Erkki V R Kojonen•Religions•2025

  • Limen transitus

    F I M Poppi•Identities•2025

  • The Epistemology of Testimony

    Jennifer Lackey, Ernest Sosa•EPISTEMOLOGY OF TESTIMONY; ED. BY…•2006

  • Not Born Yesterday

    Hugo Mercier•Not Born Yesterday•2020

  • Ecological RationalityIntelligence in the World

    Peter M Todd, Gerd Gigerenzer•Ecological rationality•2012

  • Trusting What You're Told

    Paul L Harris•Trusting What You're Told•2012

  • Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

    Open Access•Leslie K John, G Loewenstein et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Religious credence is not factual belief

    Open Access•Neil Van Leeuwen•Cognition•2014

  • Rational imitation in preverbal infants

    Open Access•György Gergely, Harold Bekkering et al.•Nature•2002

  • The misunderstood limits of folk science

    Open Access•Leonid Rozenblit, Leon Rozenblit et al.•Cognitive Science•2002

  • The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity

    Open Access•Kevin J S Zollman•Erkenntnis•2010

  • Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task

    Open Access•Petter Johansson, Lars Häll et al.•Science•2005

  • The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

    Open Access•Megan L Head, Luke Holman et al.•PLOS Biology•2015

  • Acting Contrary to Our Professed Beliefs or the Gulf Between Occurrent Judgment and Dispositional Belief

    Open Access•Eric Schwitzgebel•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2010

  • Ratcheting up the ratchet

    Open Access•Claudio Tennie, Josep Call et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2009

  • Information leakage from logically equivalent frames

    Open Access•Shlomi Sher, Craig R M Mckenzie•Cognition•2006

  • Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•N Levy•EPISTÉMÈ•2007

  • Miserliness in human cognition

    Keith E Stanovich•Thinking & Reasoning•2018

  • Gorillas in our midst

    Daniel J Simons, Christopher F Chabris•Perception•1999

  • Gorillas in Our Midst

    Open Access•Daniel J Simons, Christopher F Chabris•Perception•1999

  • Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults

    Open Access•Craig R M Mckenzie, Michael J Liersch et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • The hidden structure of overimitation

    Open Access•Derek E Lyons, Andrew G Young et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception

    Open Access•Olivier Mascaro, Dan Sperber•Cognition•2009

  • Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory

    Open Access•Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2011

  • The Ethics of Nudge

    Luc Bovens•Preference Change•2009

  • The gateway belief model

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz et al.•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2019

  • Thinking the unthinkable

    Open Access•Philip E Tetlock•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Judgment under uncertainty

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Judgment under uncertainty•1982

  • Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution

    Theodosius Dobzhansky•The American Biology Teacher•1973

  • Models of ecological rationality

    Daniel G Goldstein, Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•2002

  • Orangutan Cultures and the Evolution of Material Culture

    Open Access•C P Van Schaik, Marc Ancrenaz et al.•Science•2003

  • Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction

    Open Access•Daniel J Simons, Daniel T Levin•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•1998

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Open Access•Open Science Collaboration•Science•2015

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition

    Jonathan St B T Evans•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man

    Wilfrid Sellars•Frontiers of Science and Philosophy•1963

  • Rationalising Framing Effects

    Open Access•Sarah A Fisher•Critica•2020

  • Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism

    Johnny Brennan•Social Epistemology•2020

  • Believing to Belong

    Helen De Cruz•Social Epistemology•2020

  • Socially adaptive belief

    Open Access•D Williams•Mind & Language•2021

  • A tribal mind

    Open Access•Edward Funkhouser•Mind & Language•2022

  • Skepticism Motivated

    Open Access•J Adam Carter, Roseanne Mckenna•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • Meaning and framing

    Open Access•Sarah A Fisher•Inquiry•2022

  • Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Reconsidering the value of believing in free will

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•Cognition•2020

  • I’ll See It When I Believe It

    Matthew S Nurse, Will Grant•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience

    Open Access•Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry et al.•Theoria•2017

  • Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange

    Leda Cosmides, John Tooby•The Adapted mind•1992

  • Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk

    Dan M Kahan•Handbook of Risk Theory•2012

  • Philosophy and Climate Science

    Eric Winsberg•Philosophy and Climate Science•2018

  • Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony

    Open Access•Elizabeth Anderson•EPISTÉMÈ•2011

  • Lazy, not biased

    Open Access•Gordon Pennycook, David Rand et al.•Cognition•2018

  • The evolution of prestige

    Open Access•J Henrich, Francisco J Gil-White et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2001

  • Prestige-biased cultural learning

    Open Access•Maciej Chudek, Sarah Randal Heller et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2011

  • The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Stephan Lewandowsky et al.•Nature Climate Change•2012

  • Attitude, Inference, Association

    Open Access•Eric Mandelbaum•Noûs•2015

  • Infotopia How Many Minds Produce Knowledge

    Cass R Sunstein•Infotopia•2006

  • Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change

    Open Access•Matthew J Hornsey, E A Harris et al.•Nature Climate Change•2016

  • American Conspiracy Theories

    Joseph E Uscinski, Joseph M Parent•American conspiracy theories•2014

  • In Gods We Trust

    Open Access•Atran, Scott Atran•In Gods We Trust•2002

  • Ecological Engineering

    Open Access•N Levy•Philosophy & Technology•2012

  • In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions

    Open Access•Tim Bayne, Elisabeth Pacherie•Mind & Language•2005

  • Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior

    Dimitris Xygalatas•Religion Brain & Behavior•2013

  • Consensus on consensus

    Open Access•John Cook, Naomi Oreskes et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2016

  • Motivated numeracy and active reasoning in a Western European sample

    Open Access•Paul Connor, Emily Sullivan et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2020

  • Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Ellen Peters et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2017

  • Ideology, capitalism, and climate

    Open Access•Aaron M Mccright, Sandra T Marquart‐pyatt et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Children's Acceptance of Conflicting Testimony

    Paul L Harris, Marta Giménez•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2005

  • How Ordinary Cognition Informs Petitionary Prayer

    Open Access•Justin L Barrett•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2001

  • Epistemic Vigilance and the Science/Religion Distinction

    Konrad Talmont-Kaminski•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2020

  • You Cannot be Serious

    Markus Prior, Gaurav Sood et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics

    John G Bullock, Alan S Gerber et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • Cultural evolution in California and Paris

    Open Access•Kim Sterelny•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2017

  • Autonomy, free speech and automatic behaviour

    Open Access•Andres Moles•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2006

  • Theological Correctness

    Justin L Barrett•Method & Theory in the Study of…•1999

  • Political Position and Social Knowledge

    Open Access•J Levi Martins, M Desmond•Sociological Forum•2010

  • Weaponized Health Communication

    David Broniatowski, David A Broniatowski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Due deference to denialism

    Open Access•N Levy•Synthese•2019

  • The brittleness of expertise and why it matters

    Open Access•Daniel Kilov•Synthese•2021

  • Accountability and values in radically collaborative research

    Open Access•Eric Winsberg, Bryce Huebner et al.•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Epistemology of Disagreement

    David Christensen•The Philosophical Review•2007

  • Implicit Bias and Moral Responsibility

    Open Access•N Levy•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Experts

    Open Access•Alvin I Goldman•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001

  • Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity

    Kimberlee Weaver, Stephen M Garcia et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Thinking backward

    Daniel T Gilbert, Randall E Osborne•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Infant imitation after a 1-week delay

    Andrew N Meltzoff•Developmental Psychology•1988

  • A Simple Theory of the Survey Response

    John Zaller, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Convention

    David Lewis•Convention•2002

  • Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment

    Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Telling the Truth about Believing the Lies? Evidence for the Limited Prevalence of Expressive Survey Responding

    Adam J Berinsky•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Global warming" or "climate change

    Jonathon P Schuldt, Sara Konrath et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Reactive Devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” Peace Proposal

    Open Access•Ifat Maoz, Andrew Ward et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2002

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006)

    Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•Critical Review•2012

  • Against autonomy

    Open Access•Jennifer Denbow•Contemporary Political Theory•2014

  • The mystery of evangelical Trump support

    Open Access•Daniel D Miller•Constellations•2019

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Party Elites or Manufactured Doubt? The Informational Context of Climate Change Polarization

    Open Access•Eric Merkley, Dominik A Stecuła•Science Communication•2018

  • Biased assimilation and attitude polarization

    Charles G Lord, Lee Ro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Party Over Policy

    Geoffrey L Cohen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Motivated skepticism

    Peter H Ditto, David F Lopez•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • The unbearable automaticity of being

    John A Bargh, Tanya L Chartrand•American Psychologist•1999

  • The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos et al.•Political Psychology•2020

Unique citing works71
Citations per year17,75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 71

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae