Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intensity and the Missing Virtual

Deleuze's Reading of Spinoza

Bibliographic Data

ID5833008
AuthorsDaniela Vo (0000-0002-0414-4760, Deakin University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume11
Issue2
Pages156-173
Publication date2017-04-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDeleuze Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1750-2241 • E-ISSN: 1755-1684
PublisherEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/dls.2017.0260
OpenAlexW2607787273
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited4

Deleuze's interpretation of Spinozan philosophy is intrinsically related to the concept of intensity. Attributes are defined as intensive qualities, modal essences as intensive quantities or degrees of power; the life of affects corresponds to continuous variations in intensity. This essay will show why Deleuze needs the concept of intensity for his reading of Spinozan philosophy as a philosophy of expressive immanence. It will also discuss the problems that spring from this reading: in what way, if any, are modal essences modified by the intensive variations of affects? How can the Spinozan conception of eternal modal essences be reconciled with the idea of affections of essence? What is the ethical import of the life of existing modes, when modal essences are considered as eternal? While these questions, in particular the last two, confront each commentator on Spinoza and demand a solution in one way or another, the essay will conclude with a question which is posed from an exclusively Deleuzian perspective: why is the concept of the virtual, which takes centre stage in Deleuze's own philosophy of immanence, missing in his account of Spinoza

Immanence · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Romantic Capabilities

    Mike Goode•Romantic Capabilities•2020

  • Thinking with Spinoza about education

    E De Freitas, Sam Sellar et al.•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2017

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Essays on Deleuze

    Daniel W Smith, Daniel Smith et al.•Essays on Deleuze•2012

  • A Spinoza Reader

    Open Access•Benedictus De Spinoza, Benedict de Spinoza et al.•Spinoza Reader•1994

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,22
Citation span2017 - 2020 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae