Racial Capital, Abolition, and a Geographic Argument for Reparations

Bibliographic Data

ID5834641
AuthorsJoshua F J Inwood (0000-0002-8291-5970, Department of Geography and Rock Ethics Institute Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA, corresponding author), A L Brand (0000-0002-1004-6892, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author), Elise Andrea Quinn (Department of Geography Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume53
Issue4
Pages1083-1103
Publication date2020-12-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAntipode (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0066-4812 • E-ISSN: 1467-8330
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/anti.12704
OpenAlexW3116045334
LanguageEN
Citations received28
References cited35

Tracing the development of Lehman Brothers from their roots as a dry goods store in Montgomery, Alabama, into a Fortune 500 global financial services company that collapsed in the 2007 financial crisis reveals the contours of US-style racial capitalism. We highlight how race and capital are geographically rooted in the United States. At the heart of our argument is an understanding of the geographic imperative of capital which creates and exploits differences to wrench capital's profits from the blood, sweat, and toil of racialised bodies. Perhaps most geographically significant, we advance a second, interrelated argument, the geographic case for reparations. By arguing the system itself is entirely and wholly wrapped in race in ways that extend and advance practices of exploitation, we understand reparations that do not fundamentally undermine, transform, destabilise or smash the system as doomed to be short-term solutions to long-term structural problems

Argument (complex analysis · Capital (architecture · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Political and Economic history of UK and US

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access