Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating Perceptions towards the Consequential Validity of Integrated Language Proficiency Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID5900286
AuthorsAsli Lidice Gokturk Saglam (0000-0001-8536-269X, University of South-Eastern Norway, corresponding author), Dina Tsagari (0000-0002-6884-108X)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue1
Pages65
Publication date2022-03-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages7010065
OpenAlexW4221136415
LanguageEN
References cited36

This research study explores teacher and student perceptions to verify consequential validity and the potential washback effect of a locally developed university-level English language proficiency test which consists of reading and listening-to-writing assessment tasks. The integrated language proficiency test is used upon completion of the English language preparatory program in the Turkish context to determine learners' access to further English medium academic courses in their departments. To examine whether this source-based proficiency test has achieved its intended outcomes, 39 freshman students and 19 university instructors, who offered courses in various departments, were surveyed through questionnaires. Interviews were conducted with the instructors to gauge their perspectives about the validity of the integrated proficiency test-based decisions (whether students pass or fail) over time in terms of the language competency and academic skills of their learners. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis also revealed evidence both for positive and negative issues concerning the consequential validity of the test. Findings may help educators to reach a better understanding of the construct of integrated language assessment tasks in EAP contexts and the consequences of their use in achieving the intended and unintended curricular goals

Active listening · Construct validity · Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · English for academic purposes · Language assessment · Language proficiency · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Perception · Psychometrics · Reading (process · Test (biology · Test validity · Turkish · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Medicine · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Developing Assessment Literacy

    Open Access•Lynda Taylor•Annual Review of Applied…•2009

  • Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation Toefl

    Open Access•Alister Cumming, Robert Kantor et al.•Assessing Writing•2005

  • Students' writing from sources for academic purposes

    Open Access•Alister Cumming, Conttia Lai et al.•Journal of English for Academic…•2016

  • The Argument-Based Approach to Validation

    Michael Kane, Matthew Burns•School Psychology Review•2013

  • Textual Appropriation and Citing Behaviors of University Undergraduates

    Ling Shi•Applied Linguistics•2010

  • Topical knowledge in L2 speaking assessment

    Open Access•Heng‐Tsung Danny Huang, Heng-Tsung Danny Huang et al.•Language Testing•2018

  • Validity and washback in language testing

    Open Access•Samuel Messick•Language Testing•1996

  • Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment

    Open Access•Lia Plakans•Language Testing•2009

  • Plagiarism in second-language writing

    Open Access•Diane Pecorari, B Petric•Language Teaching•2014

  • Completely Different Worlds

    Ilona Leki, Joan G Carson et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1997

  • Validity of psychological assessment

    Samuel Messick•American Psychologist•1995

  • Staying out of trouble

    Open Access•Pat Currie•Journal of Second Language Writing•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae