A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer Assessment in Online Language Courses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5900650 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yupeng Lin (0000-0002-3182-2459, Beijing Language and Culture University), Yu Zhonggen (0000-0002-3873-980X, Beijing Language and Culture University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 47 |
| Publication date | 2023-02-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages8010047 |
| OpenAlex | W4319081841 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 81 |
As a popular strategy in collaborative learning, peer assessment has attracted keen interest in academic studies on online language learning contexts. The growing body of studies and findings necessitates the analysis of current publication trends and citation networks, given that studies in technology-enhanced language learning are increasingly active. Through a bibliometric analysis involving visualization and citation network analyses, this study finds that peer assessment in online language courses has received much attention since the COVID-19 outbreak. It remains a popular research topic with a preference for studies on online writing courses, and demonstrates international and interdisciplinary research trends. Recent studies have led peer assessment in online language courses to more specific research topics, such as critical factors for improving students' engagement and feedback quality, unique advantages in providing online peer assessment, and designs to enhance peer assessment quality. This study also provides critical aspects about how to effectively integrate educational technologies into peer assessment in online language courses. The findings in this study will encourage future studies on peer assessment in online learning, language teaching methods, and the application of educational technologies
Citation · Collaborative learning · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Online discussion · Peer Assessment · Peer feedback · Peer review · Quality (philosophy · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Educational Technology and Assessment · Innovative Teaching Methods · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Peer feedback
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Understanding the role of digital technologies in education
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Benefits of collaborative learning
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline
To give is better than to receive
CitNetExplorer
Retracted
Transpacific telecollaboration and L2 writing
Covid-19 pandemic and online learning
A meta-analysis of eight factors influencing Mooc-based learning outcomes across the world
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions
Digital reading in a second or foreign language
Promoting student engagement in online collaborative writing through a student‐facing social learning analytics tool
Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning
Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems in school settings
Online Peer Motivational Feedback in a Public Speaking Course
Self-assessment complements peer assessment for undergraduate students in an academic writing task
Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education
Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis
Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward
Where angels fear to tread
Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment
Teacher feedback on procedural skills, conceptual understanding, and mathematical practices
Learners' flow experience during peer revision in a virtual writing course during the global pandemic
Training students to become successful peer reviewers
Effects of benchmarking and peer‐assessment on French learners' self‐assessments of accentedness, comprehensibility, and fluency
Software survey
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
Peer Assessment
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |