Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Facilitating Assessment of Writing Performance in Second Language Learning
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5900754 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Zilu Jiang (0000-0003-1341-4766, Johns Hopkins University, autor correspondente), Zexin Xu (The Ohio State University), Zilong Pan (0000-0001-7641-0362, Lehigh University), Jingwen He (0000-0001-6713-4650, Michigan State University), Kui Xie (0000-0002-7173-4859, Michigan State University) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 247 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-10-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages8040247 |
| OpenAlex | W4387879283 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 11 |
This study examined the robustness and efficiency of four large language models (LLMs), GPT-4, GPT-3.5, iFLYTEK and Baidu Cloud, in assessing the writing accuracy of the Chinese language. Writing samples were collected from students in an online high school Chinese language learning program in the US. The official APIs of the LLMs were utilized to conduct analyses at both the T-unit and sentence levels. Performance metrics were employed to evaluate the LLMs' performance. The LLM results were compared to human rating results. Content analysis was conducted to categorize error types and highlight the discrepancies between human and LLM ratings. Additionally, the efficiency of each model was evaluated. The results indicate that GPT models and iFLYTEK achieved similar accuracy scores, with GPT-4 excelling in precision. These findings provide insights into the potential of LLMs in supporting the assessment of writing accuracy for language learners
Categorization · Mathematics education · Natural language processing · Sentence · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification · Artificial Intelligence
Teacher-led and technology-based handwriting evaluations
ChatGPT in language learning
Insights into EFL Students’ Perceptions of the ‘ChatGPT Essentials’ Training Course for Language Learning
EFL Students’ Perceptions of Language Learning and Assessment
Generative AI in Technical Communication
Enhancing second language speaking assessment
Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing
Profiles of Chinese as a foreign language teachers’ perceptions on generative artificial intelligence
Exploring second language writers’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |