Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Influence of Case and Word Order in Child and Adult Processing of Relative Clauses in Greek

Bibliographic Data

ID5901418
AuthorsKalliopi Katsika (0000-0002-6736-4963, University of Kaiserslautern, corresponding author), Maria Lialiou (0000-0002-9788-1443, University of Cologne), Shanley E M Allen (0000-0002-5421-6750, University of Kaiserslautern, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue3
Pages206
Publication date2022-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages7030206
OpenAlexW4289517610
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited58

Previous cross-linguistic studies have shown that object relative clauses (ORCs) are typically harder to parse than subject relative clauses (SRCs). The cause of difficulty, however, is still under debate, both in the adult and in the developmental literature. The present study investigates the on-line processing of SRCs and ORCs in Greek-speaking 11- to 12-year-old children and adults, and provides evidence on relative clause processing in Greek-a free word order language. We conducted a self-paced listening task in which we manipulated the type of relative clause (SRC vs. ORC), the RC internal word order (canonical vs. scrambled), and the type of relativizer (relative pronoun vs. complementizer). The results showed that SRCs were overall processed faster than ORCs, providing evidence that children follow similar processing strategies to adults. In addition, accusative case marking facilitated the processing of non-canonical structures in adults but less so in children. Children showed heavy reliance on word order, as they processed nominative and accusative pre-verbal NPs in exactly the same way, while they were strongly garden-pathed in ORCs with post-verbal nominative NPs. We argue that these results are compatible with the Competition Model

Active listening · Dependent clause · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Nominative case · Order (exchange · Parsing · Relative clause · Verb · Word order · Communication · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Artificial Intelligence

  • Similarity effects in the online and offline comprehension of relative clauses

    Open Access•Despina Papadopoulou, Gerakini Douka et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2025

  • A Typological Analysis of Relativization Strategies Driven by Corpus Data

    Open Access•Wei Wang, Junxia Ge et al.•SAGE Open•2026

  • Triangulating learner corpus and online experimental data

    Open Access•Despina Papadopoulou, Nikolaos Amvrazis et al.•Modern Language Journal•2024

  • Bilingual children’s online processing of relative clauses

    Open Access•Kalliopi Katsika, Maria Lialiou et al.•Linguistic Approaches to…•2024

  • Developmental Psycholinguistics

    I A Sekerina, Eva M FERNÁNDEZ et al.•Developmental psycholinguistics•2008

  • Adverb Placement

    Artemis Alexiadou•Adverb Placement•1997

  • The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic

    Open Access•Nathaniel J Smith, Roger Levy•Cognition•2013

  • Grammatical processing in language learners

    Open Access•Harald Clahsen, Claudia Felser•Applied Psycholinguistics•2006

  • Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity

    Open Access•Daniel Grodner, Edward Gibson et al.•Cognitive Science•2005

  • The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing

    Open Access•Willem M Mak, Wietske Vonk et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2002

  • Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Matthew J Traxler, Robin K Morris et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2002

  • Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension

    Open Access•Brian Mcelree, Stephani Foraker et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2003

  • Filler driven parsing

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Giovanni B Flores D’arcais et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•1989

  • Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism

    Open Access•Edward Gibson, E Leigh Gibson et al.•Cognition•1996

  • The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity

    Open Access•Tessa Warren, Edward Gibson•Cognition•2002

  • A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model

    John Hale•Second meeting of the North…•2001

  • Individual differences in syntactic processing

    Open Access•Jonathan King, Marcel Adam Just•Journal of Memory and Language•1991

  • Linguistic complexity

    Open Access•Edward Gibson•Cognition•1998

  • An Activation‐Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval

    Open Access•Richard L Lewis, Shravan Vasishth•Cognitive Science•2005

  • Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser

    Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•Language and Cognitive Processes•1989

  • Reassessing working memory

    Maryellen C Macdonald, Morten H Christiansen•Psychological Review•2002

  • Processing relative clauses in Chinese

    Open Access•Franny Hsiao, Franny Pai-Fang Hsiao et al.•Cognition•2003

  • Expectation-based syntactic comprehension

    Open Access•Roger Levy•Cognition•2008

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • The role of language processing in language acquisition

    Colin Phillips, Lara Ehrenhofer•Linguistic Approaches to…•2015

  • Comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition

    Open Access•Spyridoula Varlokosta, Michaela Nerantzini et al.•Journal of Child Language•2015

  • Rethinking child difficulty

    Open Access•Inbal Arnon•Journal of Child Language•2010

  • Greek

    David Holton, Peter Mackridge et al.•Greek•2012

  • Subjects and configurationality

    Open Access•Geoffrey Horrocks•Journal of Linguistics•1994

  • Continuity in the Adult and Children's Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian

    Open Access•Maria Teresa Guasti, Mirta Vernice et al.•Languages•2018

  • Syntactic Features in Reanalysis

    Open Access•Janet Dean Fodor, J Fodor et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000

  • Learning To Parse

    Open Access•Janet Dean Fodor•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1998

  • Locality and Parsing Complexity

    Open Access•Lars Konieczny•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000

  • Continuity and shallow structures in language processing

    Open Access•Harald Clahsen, Claudia Felser•Applied Psycholinguistics•2006

  • Assignment of grammatical functions in French relative clauses

    Open Access•M A Schelstraete, Marie‐Anne Schelstraete et al.•Language Sciences•1998

  • Relativized relatives

    Open Access•Naama Friedmann, Adriana Belletti et al.•Lingua•2009

  • Frequency Affects Object Relative Clause Processing

    Open Access•Florencia Reali-Arcos, Florencia Reali•Language Learning•2014

  • Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in the acquisition of relative clauses

    Open Access•Maria Teresa Guasti, Stavroula Stavrakaki et al.•Lingua•2012

  • Relativization in modern Greek

    Open Access•Brian D Joseph•Lingua•1983

  • Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity

    Open Access•Shravan Vasishth, Richard L Lewis•Language•2006

  • A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Holger Diessel, M Tomasello•Language•2005

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae