Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Epistemic Stance in Chinese L2 Spoken English

The Effect of Grade and Genre-Specific Questions

Bibliographic Data

ID5901482
AuthorsFang Xu (0000-0001-8201-1595, Beijing Forestry University), Rongping Cao (0000-0002-1703-8174, Beijing Forestry University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume8
Issue1
Pages15
Publication date2022-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages8010015
OpenAlexW4313388834
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited28

Zuczkowski et al.'s KUB model clarified three epistemic stances: Knowing/Certain, Not Knowing Whether and Believing/Uncertain, and Unknowing/Neither Certain nor Uncertain, according to the speakers' communicated information, and delineated three types of markers: macro-markers, micro-markers, and morphosyntactic markers. The model has seldom been applied to L2 instruction. To address this gap, the study examines the effect of grade and genre-specific questions on Chinese L2 speakers' choice of epistemic markers with reference to the model by analyzing the self-built corpus consisting of the oral data collected from two groups: Group One consisting of 20 sophomores and Group Two comprising 20 first-year graduate students. The participants were required to answer four genre-specific questions covering argumentation, description, narration, and exposition. The results show that the two group members use similar epistemic markers (EMs) for the Knowing/Certain and Not Knowing Whether and Believing /Uncertain positions but present a slight discrepancy in Unknowing/Neither Certain nor Uncertain stance-taking. The genre-based questions demonstrate a significant effect on the graduate speakers' use of the micro-markers and morphosyntactic markers for the Not Knowing Whether and Believing/Uncertain and the macro-markers and morphosyntactic markers for the Unknowing/Neither Certain nor Uncertain. It indicates that high-grade speakers are more sensitive to genre-based messages, though they use rather limited epistemic forms as low-grade speakers do. The findings suggest that English as a Second Language (ESL) oral instruction in China should be reformed and supplemented with diverse EMs to allow the speakers to take the epistemic stance they are comfortable with

Argumentation theory · Art · Exposition (narrative · Linguistics · Literature · Narrative · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Uncertainty markers in spoken learner discourse

    Open Access•Petra Huschová•Discourse and Interaction•2025

  • Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity

    Open Access•Elinor Ochs•The New Sociolinguistics Reader•2009

  • Stancetaking in Discourse

    Robert Englebretson•Stancetaking in discourse•2007

  • The stance triangle

    John W Du Bois•Stancetaking in discourse•2007

  • Epistemic Stance in English Conversation

    Elise Kärkkäinen•Epistemic stance in English…•2003

  • Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics

    Open Access•John Lyons, John S Lyons•Introduction to Theoretical…•1968

  • Elastic ‘I think’

    Grace Zhang, Grace Q Zhang et al.•Applied Linguistics•2016

  • Epistemic Stance in Spoken L2 English

    Dana Gablasova, Vaclav Brezina et al.•Applied Linguistics•2017

  • The Differential Effects of Explicit and Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Use of Epistemic Stance

    Kenneth Fordyce•Applied Linguistics•2014

  • Questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Ampersand•2018

  • From incompetence to competence

    Sajjad Pouromid•Asian Englishes•2021

  • “Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account

    Scott A Thompson, Sandra A Thompson•Studies in Language•2002

  • Task‐Based Language Learning

    Open Access•Peter Robinson•Language Learning•2011

  • Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance

    Douglas Biber•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2004

  • Intellectual Development

    Open Access•Pierre Meyer•The Counseling Psychologist•1977

  • Ignorance-unmasking questions in the Royal-Sarkozy presidential debate

    Open Access•Laura Vincze, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Discourse Studies•2016

  • Mitigation and epistemic positions in troubles talk

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Language & Communication•2014

  • The Counselor as a Developmental Instructor

    Open Access•Carole Widick, L Lee Knefelkamp et al.•Counselor Education and Supervision•1975

  • A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs

    Open Access•Pascual Pérez-Paredes, M Camino Bueno-Alastuey•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • Dubitative questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Lingua•2018

  • Mood and Modality

    Open Access•F R Palmer•Mood and Modality•2001

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae