Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Collective Decision-Making Models Applied to Labor Negotiations in the Netherlands

A Comparison Between an Exchange Model and a Conflict Model

Bibliographic Data

ID5917310
AuthorsMaurice Rojer (corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume11
Issue2
Pages207-235
Publication date1999-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRationality and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1043-4631 • E-ISSN: 1461-7358
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/104346399011002005
OpenAlexW2013543746
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited9

In this article two models of collective decision making, i.e. the Exchange of Voting Positions Model of Stokman and van Oosten and the Expected Utility Model of Bueno de Mesquita, are applied to the practice of labor negotiations in the Netherlands. The purpose of the study is to test the explanatory power of both models with regard to actual labor negotiation processes. Based on data regarding three variables, preferred outcomes, salience, and potential power, the models can simulate a process of collective decision making in a multilateral setting and with respect to a multi-issue agenda. The simulated process leads to predicted outcomes which will be compared with the actual outcomes after the actual negotiations have taken place. With the help of statistical tests regarding the predictive accuracy of the models, an answer will be given to the question of whether one or both of the models can give an adequate explanation of the outcomes of labor negotiation processes

Cognitive psychology · Econometrics · Economics · Microeconomics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Voting · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Strategic decision making

    Frans N Stokman, M A L M Van Assen et al.•Advances in Group Processes,…•2004

  • Analyzing the dynamics in multilateral negotiations

    Open Access•Frits Van Merode, Anna Nieboer et al.•Social Networks•2004

  • Bargaining in the European Union and Shifts in Actors’ Policy Positions

    Open Access•Javier Arregui, Frans N Stokman et al.•European Union Politics•2004

  • Shifting policy positions in the European Union

    Open Access•Javier Arregui•European Journal of Political…•2008

  • Decision-Making Models, Rigor and New Puzzles

    Open Access•Bruce Bueno De Mesquita•European Union Politics•2004

  • Decision context and policy effectuation

    Robert J Mokken, Diane Payne et al.•Irish Political Studies•2000

  • Is Implementation Distinct from Political Bargaining

    Open Access•René Torenvlied, Rob Thomson et al.•Rationality and Society•2003

  • Involuntary disputes

    Open Access•Agnes Akkerman•Rationality and Society•2014

  • Gender composition effects in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Judith M P De Ruijter, Matt L Huffman•Social Science Research•2003

  • Two-Person Cooperative Games

    John Nash, John C Nash•Econometrica•1953

  • The Bargaining Problem

    John F Nash•Econometrica•1950

  • Bargaining

    David R Maines, B Bacharach et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1983

  • Multilateral negotiations

    Open Access•Bruce Bueno De Mesquita•International Organization•1990

Citations per year0.35
Citation span2000 - 2014 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae