Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Identifying Latent Conflict in Collective Bargaining

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5917459
AutoresMarjolein C Achterkamp (University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Marjolein Achterkamp (University of Groningen), Agnes Akkerman (0000-0002-6407-7563, Faculty of Law, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9049, 6500 KK, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)
Ano2003
Volume15
Fascículo1
Páginas15-43
Data de publicação2003-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRationality and Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1043-4631 • E-ISSN: 1461-7358
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1043463103015001067
OpenAlexW2023804540
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas15

The purpose of this article is to find indicators of the substantive incentives for industrial conflict. We argue that collective decision-making models can be helpful in developing such a measurement tool. These indicators will enable scholars in industrial relations to distinguish the substantive incentives from other reasons for calling out strikes, e.g. union internal political incentives or trade union competition for members. The models we use are the expected utility model of Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and the exchange model of Frans Stokman and Reinier van Oosten. These models differ in their assumptions on how the collective bargaining process proceeds. The expected utility model is based on the assumption that actors reach collective decisions after threats and conflict. The exchange model is based on a cooperative strategy. Our indicators of industrial conflict are tested on a data set with information on 29 collective agreement negotiations in which 90 trade unions are nested. The data set contains instances of both industrial conflict and peaceful settlements of collective agreements. The results show that the indicator based on the expected utility model is a good indicator of industrial conflict, whereas that based on the exchange model is a poor one. This seems to contradict findings in previous applications of both models of collective bargaining, in which the exchange model provided the most accurate predictions of the bargaining outcomes. We conclude that although the exchange model provides better predictions at the aggregate level (the collective outcome), the expected utility model generates superior predictions of the individual positions after bargaining

Collective bargaining · Economics · Incentive · Market economy · Microeconomics · Negotiation · Political science · Computer Science · Labor Movements and Unions

  • Involuntary disputes

    Open Access•Agnes Akkerman•Rationality and Society•2014

  • The Puzzle of Strikes

    Open Access•Roberto Franzosi•Puzzle of Strikes•1995

  • European Community Decision Making

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita•European Community Decision Making•1994

  • The Theory of Wages

    Open Access•John Hicks, J R Hicks•Theory of Wages•1963

  • Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict

    Alessandro Pizzorno•Resurgence of Class Conflict in…•1978

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Systems of social exchange

    James S Coleman•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1972

  • Forecasting political events

    C S Burchill•International Affairs•1986

  • Strikes, Industrial Relations and Class Conflict in Capitalist Societies

    Walter Korpi, Michael Shalev•British Journal of Sociology•1979

  • Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining

    Everett M Kassalow, H A Clegg et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1977

  • Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations

    Daniel J B Mitchell, Thomas A Kochan•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1981

  • Imperfect Information and Strikes

    Open Access•Jean-Michel Cousineau, Jean‐Michel Cousineau et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1986

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,08
Intervalo de citações2014 - 2014 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae