Societal Perceptions and Acceptance of Virtual Humans
Trust and Ethics across Different Contexts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5935205 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Gerlich (0000-0003-4033-4403, SBS Swiss Business School, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 516 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci13100516 |
| OpenAlex | W4402990777 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 44 |
This article examines public perceptions of virtual humans across various contexts, including social media, business environments, and personal interactions. Using an experimental approach with 371 participants in the United Kingdom, this research explores how the disclosure of virtual human technology influences trust, performance perception, usage likelihood, and overall acceptance. Participants interacted with virtual humans in simulations, initially unaware of their virtual nature, and then completed surveys to capture their perceptions before and after disclosure. The results indicate that trust and acceptance are higher in social media contexts, whereas business and general settings reveal significant negative shifts post-disclosure. Trust emerged as a critical factor influencing overall acceptance, with social media interactions maintaining higher levels of trust and performance perceptions than business environments and general interactions. A qualitative analysis of open-ended responses and follow-up interviews highlights concerns about transparency, security, and the lack of human touch. Participants expressed fears about data exploitation and the ethical implications of virtual human technology, particularly in business and personal settings. This study underscores the importance of ethical guidelines and transparent protocols to enhance the adoption of virtual humans in diverse sectors. These findings offer valuable insights for developers, marketers, and policymakers to optimise virtual human integration while addressing societal apprehensions, ultimately contributing to more effective and ethical deployment of virtual human technologies
Perception · Sociology · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Virtual Influencers as Visual-Culture Artifacts
How conversational styles relate to trust in virtual humans
Making and Breaking Parasocial Relationships with Human and Virtual Influencers
Ethics in influencer marketing
Who Wants to Try AI? Profiling AI Adopters and AI‐Trusting Publics in South Korea
Algorithmic reconfiguration of mental health care
Mapping the rise of virtual influencers
Living up to the chatbot hype
The Roles of Personality Traits, AI Anxiety, and Demographic Factors in Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence
The future of employment
How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans
Trust influences perceptions of virtual humans, but not necessarily learning
Close Encounters of the AI Kind
AI in the headlines
Toward a More Equal World
Influencer Marketing
It’s only a computer
Virtual vs. human influencer
A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2
Cooperating with life-like interface agents
Virtual humans as social actors
Perceptions and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |