Sheldon Pollock and Max Weber
Why Pollock is more Weberian than he thinks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5950008 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D N Gellner (0000-0001-5152-1680, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 212-234 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Max Weber Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-8078 • E-ISSN: 2056-4074 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/max.2017.0016 |
| OpenAlex | W4379621594 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Sheldon Pollock is the leading North American Indologist and his magnum opus, The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India, is a field-defining classic. Pollock takes himself to be a fierce critic of Max Weber, but in fact his comparative historical approach shares much with Weber, and where it is wanting would have benefited from more, not less, Weberian influence. Pollock’s vision of language history and his views on religion and legitimation are considered in detail
Art · Art history · Legitimation · Literature · Magnum opus · Political science · Politics · Pollock · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |