From informational to emotive use
Meiyou (`no') as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5965142 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yifan F Wang (0000-0003-2016-0047, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan,, corresponding author), Yu-Fang Wang, Pi-Hua Tsai (0000-0002-9043-865X, China University of Technology, Taiwan, corresponding author), Meng-Ying Ling (National Chungcheng University, Taiwan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 677-701 |
| Publication date | 2007-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445607081271 |
| OpenAlex | W2005189273 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 38 |
Discourse marker analysis has been widely studied, leading Fraser (1998: 301) to call this subject `a growth market in linguistics'. In our present research, we extended the study of discourse markers to the Chinese marker meiyou, which has traditionally been treated as a negator (e.g. Biq, 1989; Teng, 1973a, 1973b, 1975). The corpus studied here contains 40 conversations, totaling 482'27”. The analytical framework adopted in the study was drawn from van Dijk's model (1979), which mainly consists of a semantic/textual level (i.e. sequences of utterances/propositions) and a pragmatic/interactional level (i.e. speech-acts). A total of 141 occurrences of meiyou were identified as discourse markers in the corpus: 13 of them occur at the textual level and 128 of them at the interactional level. Thus, meiyou occurs more frequently at the interactional level than at the textual level. At the textual level, meiyou introduces an answer to a self-inquiry or self-correction. At the interactional level, meiyou mainly serves as a response to provide information, as a marker of correction/clarification or evasion, and as a response to praise or gratitude. In particular, with respect to meiyou's interactive functions, we use the concepts of preference structure (Sacks et al., 1974) and face-threatening acts (Brown and Levinson, [1978] 1987) to analyze the collected data. We further demonstrate that intersubjectification (Traugott and Dasher, 2002), a mechanism whereby meanings become more centered on the addressee, is involved in the development of the discourse marker meiyou
Conversation · Conversation analysis · Discourse analysis · Discourse marker · Emotive · Gratitude · Implicature · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Pragmatics · Sociology · Communication · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology
Clicks as resources in the organization of responsive actions in Syrian Arabic interaction
Diachronic Research on Chinese Discourse Markers in China
Is formality relevant? Japanese tokens hai , ee and un
The question-response system in Mandarin conversation
Making claims and counterclaims through factuality
Grammatical conformity in question-answer sequences
The impact of context on discourse marker use in two conversational genres
Code-switching and borrowing in Irish1
Discourse markers produced by Chinese-speaking seniors with and without Alzheimer's disease
Regularity in Semantic Change
Discourse Markers
Mandarin Chinese
The Study of Discourse
Subjectification in grammaticalisation
Turn organization
From subjectification to intersubjectification
Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments
Compliment Responses
Logic and Conversation
Interaction Ritual
From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization
When 'others' initiate repair
Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization
On the universality of face
Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis
Practices and actions
Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation
What are discourse markers
Responding to compliments A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers
Power, severity, and context in disagreement
An approach to discourse markers
Spanish no, sí
Pragmatic connectives
Disagreement and contradiction as communicative acts
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English
The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Syntax
Yes, but
Repair After Next Turn
Speech Acts
Pragmatics
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2026 (19) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |