Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From informational to emotive use

Meiyou (`no') as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation

Bibliographic Data

ID5965142
AuthorsYifan F Wang (0000-0003-2016-0047, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan,, corresponding author), Yu-Fang Wang, Pi-Hua Tsai (0000-0002-9043-865X, China University of Technology, Taiwan, corresponding author), Meng-Ying Ling (National Chungcheng University, Taiwan, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume9
Issue5
Pages677-701
Publication date2007-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445607081271
OpenAlexW2005189273
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited38

Discourse marker analysis has been widely studied, leading Fraser (1998: 301) to call this subject `a growth market in linguistics'. In our present research, we extended the study of discourse markers to the Chinese marker meiyou, which has traditionally been treated as a negator (e.g. Biq, 1989; Teng, 1973a, 1973b, 1975). The corpus studied here contains 40 conversations, totaling 482'27”. The analytical framework adopted in the study was drawn from van Dijk's model (1979), which mainly consists of a semantic/textual level (i.e. sequences of utterances/propositions) and a pragmatic/interactional level (i.e. speech-acts). A total of 141 occurrences of meiyou were identified as discourse markers in the corpus: 13 of them occur at the textual level and 128 of them at the interactional level. Thus, meiyou occurs more frequently at the interactional level than at the textual level. At the textual level, meiyou introduces an answer to a self-inquiry or self-correction. At the interactional level, meiyou mainly serves as a response to provide information, as a marker of correction/clarification or evasion, and as a response to praise or gratitude. In particular, with respect to meiyou's interactive functions, we use the concepts of preference structure (Sacks et al., 1974) and face-threatening acts (Brown and Levinson, [1978] 1987) to analyze the collected data. We further demonstrate that intersubjectification (Traugott and Dasher, 2002), a mechanism whereby meanings become more centered on the addressee, is involved in the development of the discourse marker meiyou

Conversation · Conversation analysis · Discourse analysis · Discourse marker · Emotive · Gratitude · Implicature · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Pragmatics · Sociology · Communication · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Clicks as resources in the organization of responsive actions in Syrian Arabic interaction

    Open Access•Katinka Weber, Anahita Hesso et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2026

  • Diachronic Research on Chinese Discourse Markers in China

    Open Access•Guoping Yang, Mian Jia•SAGE Open•2025

  • Is formality relevant? Japanese tokens hai , ee and un

    Open Access•Lidia Tanaka•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • The question-response system in Mandarin conversation

    Open Access•Wei Wang•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2021

  • Making claims and counterclaims through factuality

    Open Access•Yifan F Wang, Yu-Fang Wang et al.•Discourse Studies•2011

  • Grammatical conformity in question-answer sequences

    Open Access•Wei Wang•Discourse Studies•2020

  • The impact of context on discourse marker use in two conversational genres

    Open Access•Darinka Verdonik, Andrej Žgank et al.•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Code-switching and borrowing in Irish1

    Open Access•Tina Hickey, Tina M Hickey•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2009

  • Discourse markers produced by Chinese-speaking seniors with and without Alzheimer's disease

    Open Access•Yi-Hsiu Lai, Yi‐hsiu Lai et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Regularity in Semantic Change

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Richard B Dasher•Regularity in Semantic Change•2001

  • Discourse Markers

    Open Access•Deborah Schiffrin•Discourse Markers•1987

  • Mandarin Chinese

    Li Thompson, Charles N Li et al.•Mandarin Chinese•1981

  • The Study of Discourse

    T A Van Dijk•Discourse as Structure and…•1997

  • Subjectification in grammaticalisation

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Subjectivity and Subjectivisation•1995

  • Turn organization

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Interaction and Grammar•1996

  • From subjectification to intersubjectification

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Motives for Language Change•2003

  • Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Structures of Social Action•1985

  • Compliment Responses

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Studies in the organization of…•1978

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Interaction Ritual

    Erving Goffman, Joel Best•Interaction Ritual•2017

  • From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Perspectives on historical…•1982

  • When 'others' initiate repair

    Emanuel A Schegloff, E Schegloff•Applied Linguistics•2000

  • Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization

    Open Access•Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1988

  • On the universality of face

    Open Access•Ming-Chung Yu•Journal of Pragmatics•2003

  • Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation, Analysis

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Discourse Studies•1999

  • Practices and actions

    Emanuel A Schegloff•Discourse Processes•1997

  • Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation

    Open Access•Uta Lenk•Journal of Pragmatics•1998

  • What are discourse markers

    Open Access•Bruce Fraser•Journal of Pragmatics•1999

  • Responding to compliments A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers

    Open Access•Rong Chen•Journal of Pragmatics•1993

  • Power, severity, and context in disagreement

    Open Access•Janie Rees-Miller, Janie Rees‐miller•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • An approach to discourse markers

    Open Access•Bruce Fraser•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • Spanish no, sí

    Open Access•Dale A Koike, Robert E Vann et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2001

  • Pragmatic connectives

    Open Access•T A Van Dijk•Journal of Pragmatics•1979

  • Disagreement and contradiction as communicative acts

    Open Access•Karl Sornig•Journal of Pragmatics•1977

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott•Language•1989

  • The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar

    Paul J Hopper, Scott A Thompson et al.•Language•1984

  • The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation

    Emanuel A Schegloff, Gail Jefferson et al.•Language•1977

  • Syntax

    Talmy Givón•Syntax•1984

  • Yes, but

    Open Access•T Holtgraves•Journal of Language and Social…•1997

  • Repair After Next Turn

    Emanuel A Schegloff•American Journal of Sociology•1992

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

  • Pragmatics

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Pragmatics•1983

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae