Investigative interviews with online sexual offenders
A discursive analysis of verbal cues of deception
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5965151 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Noémie Allard-Gaudreau (0009-0003-0262-8811, Université Laval, corresponding author), Nadine Deslauriers-Varin, Nadine Deslauriers‐Varin (0000-0002-2645-0101, Université Laval), Sarah Paquette (0000-0003-3276-5641, University of Portsmouth), Francis Fortin (0000-0002-7110-4275, Université de Montréal) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 699-717 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614456251324546 |
| OpenAlex | W4408957808 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
The objective of this study is to investigate how individuals convicted of online sexual crimes use language to deceive police investigators during investigative interviews. Discursive and interactional cues that may indicate deception were identified based on the suspects’ responses to questions asked by the police investigator, that is, whether the questions had a high or low potential to elicit deceit. To refine the selection of deceptive answers to be analyzed, the information that was contradicted or questioned during the interview was then targeted for each suspect. The results show that seven elements - grammatical negations, argumentative markers, uncertainty markers, use of the conditional, ignorance markers, sincerity markers, and volubility - distinguish between truthful and deceptive responses. Findings suggest that these elements are used as strategies to convince the investigator of the truthfulness of the (deceptive) statements being made and to avoid providing information that could be refuted during the interview
Cognitive psychology · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Deception · Discourse analysis · Discursive psychology · Linguistics · Nonverbal communication · Communication · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Psychology · Social Psychology · Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Lying and Deception
The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception
Présentation
On Lying and Being Lied To
Online Child Pornography Offenders are Different
Effects of rapport building on confessions in an experimental paradigm
Détecter l’appelant dissimulateur au service d’urgence 9-1-1
Lies, rebukes and social norms
Lying Words
Cues to deception
Forensic Linguistics
Real Interrogation
When police treat straightforward answers as uncooperative
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |