Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Divided discourse

Establishing a methods-centered approach to latrinalia research

Bibliographic Data

ID5966027
AuthorsJonathan Marine (0000-0003-2467-6358, George Mason University, corresponding author), Brandon Biller (George Mason University), Lauren Tuckley (0000-0002-8684-6749, George Mason University)
Year2021
Volume23
Issue3
Pages274-295
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/14614456211001608
OpenAlexW3154749715
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Past research on bathroom graffiti (latrinalia) has utilized disparate collection and analysis methodologies. Here, we seek to devise a rigorous, unified methodological framework for the collection and analysis of latrinalia. We begin by reviewing the disjointed methodological approaches and findings of previous research on bathroom graffiti in order to trace the limitations which prevent generalizability across datasets in comparable, meaningful ways. We also target some of the specific arguments and research questions presented in previous studies. Then, using study of bathroom graffiti, we sketch a replicable, scalable methodological framework for studying bathroom graffiti in order to analyze the discourse of a large corpus of latrinalia collected from the bathrooms of George Mason University in Virginia. This article as a whole illustrates that until the field aligns collection and analysis methods - defining what constitutes discourse, collecting data from male and female bathrooms, and accounting for the number of buildings, restrooms, and stalls - the seminal questions of the field will never be adequately addressed. We conclude by discussing the limitations of our research design and pointing toward potential future directions in latrinalia research

Data collection · Data science · Discourse analysis · Generalizability theory · Graffiti · Legibility · Linguistics · Sketch · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Computer Science · Psychology · Public Spaces through Art · Urban and sociocultural dynamics

  • Graffiti beyond words in times of crisis

    Open Access•Mabel Victoria•Language and Intercultural…•2025

  • “Meeting of Styles” and the online infrastructures of graffiti

    Jan Blommaert•Applied Linguistics Review•2016

  • Graffiti of Canadian High School Students

    Open Access•S M S Ahmed•Psychological Reports•1981

  • Private Restroom Graffiti

    Open Access•George E Schreer, Jeremy M Strichartz•Psychological Reports•1997

  • Is It Philosophy or Pornography? Graffiti at the Dinosaur Bar‐B‐Que

    Open Access•Lynn Bartholome, Philip Snyder•The Journal of American Culture•2004

  • Social Issues on Walls

    Open Access•Onuigbo G Nwoye•Discourse & Society•1993

  • The thematic content of graffiti as a nonreactive indicator of male and female attitudes

    John A Bates, Michael Martin et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•1980

  • Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists

    Open Access•Anselm L Strau, Anselm L Strauss•Qualitative Analysis for Social…•1987

  • Anonymous Expression

    George Gonos, Virginia Mulkern et al.•Journal of American Folklore•1976

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae