Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors Contributing to Unfulfilment of and Changes in Fertility Intentions in Czechia

Bibliographic Data

ID6012505
AuthorsHana Hašková (0000-0002-3708-5816, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Sociology), Kristýna Pospíšilová (0000-0001-6788-5980, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Sociology)
Year2019
Volume9
Issue1
Pages15-34
Publication date2019-09-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropological Researches and Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2360-3445 • E-ISSN: 2360-3445
PublisherAnthropological Researches and Studies (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26758/9.1.2
OpenAlexW2972148930
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

Objectives. Achieved fertility is lower than intended fertility in Europe. The factors contributing to this mismatch are thus an important research topic. The objective of this study is to identify the factors that contribute to the unfulfilment of short-term fertility intentions and to changes in the intended number of children to improve our understanding of the mismatch between achieved and intended fertility in Czechia. Material and methods. Binary logistic regression is applied to data on people aged 18-45 from two waves of the Generations and Gender Survey from 2005 and 2008 to explore what factors contribute to the unfulfilment of short-term fertility intentions, and to the Life Course 2010 data on people aged 25-60 from 2010 to identify what factors contribute to changes in the intended number of children. Descriptive statistics show the most cited reasons for the downward or upward changes in fertility intentions. Results. The results show the importance of gender, partner, age, cohort, and the two-child norm for the chance that short-term fertility intentions will be left unfulfilled and the chance that people will change the number of children they plan to have. The results confirm that short-term fertility intentions are predictors of fertility behaviour, and labour market instability and siblings are factors that influence the number of children a person intends to have. Economic conditions, health, and the absence of a partner are the main reasons given to explain downward changes in the number of children people plan to have, while a change of values / new experiences and the influence of one‘s partner explain upward changes. Conclusions. This study contributes to existing knowledge by testing factors associated with both, the fulfilment of short-term fertility intentions and changes in lifetime fertility intentions. They are rarely analysed together, although they both contribute to the postponement of childbearing and the mismatch between intended and achieved fertility

Cohort · Descriptive statistics · Fertility · Logistic regression · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Population · Sociology · Statistics · Term (time · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Disentangling the link between having one child and partnership trajectories

    Radka Dudová, Hana Hašková et al.•Journal of Family Studies•2020

  • Parenting intentions and desires among childless lesbian, gay, and heterosexual individuals.

    Rachel G Riskind, Charlotte J Patterson•Journal of Family Psychology•2010

  • Bringing norms back in

    Open Access•Aart C Liefbroer, Francesco C Billari•Population Space and Place•2009

  • How are Time-Dependent Childbearing Intentions Realized? Realization, Postponement, Abandonment, Bringing Forward

    Open Access•Zsolt Spéder, Balázs Kapitány•European Journal of Population /…•2009

  • Racing Against the Biological Clock? Childbearing and Sterility Among Men and Women in Second Unions in France

    Open Access•Éva Beaujouan, Anne Solaz•European Journal of Population /…•2013

  • Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction

    Open Access•L Bernardi•Population Research and Policy…•2003

  • Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births

    Open Access•Elizabeth Thomson•Demography•1997

  • The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course

    Open Access•Sarah R Hayford•Demography•2009

  • Who Remains Childless? Unrealized Fertility Plans in Hungary

    Open Access•Ivett Szalma, Judit Takács•Czech Sociological Review•2015

  • The Correspondence Between Fertility Intentions and Behavior in the United States

    Open Access•Philip Morgan, S Philip Morgan et al.•Population and Development Review•2010

  • Two Is Best? The Persistence of a Two‐Child Family Ideal in Europe

    Open Access•Tomáš Sobotka, Éva Beaujouan•Population and Development Review•2014

  • Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World

    Open Access•Tomáš Sobotka, Vegard Skirbekk et al.•Population and Development Review•2011

  • Institutions and Discourses on Childcare for Children Under the Age of Three in a Comparative French-Czech Perspective

    Open Access•Hana Hašková, Radka Dudová•Sociological Research Online•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae