Anymore, It’s on Twitter
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6031357 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Strelluf (0000-0003-1539-1254, University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 313-351 |
| Publication date | 2019-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00031283-7587883 |
| OpenAlex | W2923963292 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 49 |
Positive anymore is recognized as a feature of some dialects of English. However, because positive anymore occurs infrequently in conversational speech, studies have generally relied on grammaticality judgments. This article takes advantage of the massive corpus of speech-like text available on the social media platform Twitter to study productions of positive anymore in American English. More than 80,000 tweets containing anymore were collected over one month from areas around five Midland cities and three non-Midland cities. Tweets were coded for 20 types of negative polarity item (NPI) triggers and for the position of anymore within clauses. Results confirm that, in the context of American regional Englishes, positive anymore is a distinctive feature of the Midland. However, results also show intraregional differences within the Midland, with anymore being produced more frequently in Pittsburgh and less frequently in the western Midland cities of Kansas City and St. Louis. Midland cities also show increased incidence of anymore with several NPI triggers that should license NPIs in all dialects, suggesting that these ostensibly ordinary NPI triggers may affect or be affected by the use of anymore in positive polarity contexts. More generally, this research models ways that productions of positive anymore and other low-frequency linguistic variables might be studied through media like Twitter
Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Feature (linguistics · Geography · Grammar · Grammaticality · License · Linguistics · Polarity (international relations · Political science · Social media · Digital Communication and Language · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Anymore, this feature varies
Using social-media data to investigate morphosyntactic variation and dialect syntax in a lesser-used language
Regional Variation and Syntactic Derivation of Low-frequency need -passives on Twitter
When Missoura Got Warshed Out
Variation across Regions and Demographics in African American Language Morphosyntax
The stigma enigma
This Is the Way People Are Negative Anymore
Needs+past Participle in Regional Englishes on Twitter
Why does the shtyle spread? Street prestige boosts the diffusion of urban vernacular features
Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation
The Atlas of North American English
New Zealand English
Unbiased Recursive Partitioning
Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat
Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a
Models, forests, and trees of York English
Negative Contexts
Dictionary of American Regional English
Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage
The American Language
The Structure of Language
American Dialect Dictionary
Notes on American Usage
Any More on Anymore
Linguistic Geography and the American Atlas
Notes on the Philadelphia Dialect
Observations on American Colloquial Idiom
The Speech of South-Western Pennsylvania
Notes on Indiana Speech
The Scotch-Irish Influence on American English
Any More Again
Any More in the Affirmative
West Virginia Peculiarities
Positive Anymore in Southeastern Pennsylvania
Audience-Modulated Variation in Online Social Media
You’re So Not Going to Believe This
Toward a Description of African American Vernacular English Dialect Regions Using “Black Twitter
Put the Groceries Up
Dialect Boundaries in New Jersey
Negative contexts'. Collocation, polarity and multiple negation
The Geography of Speech
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |