The Strategic Performance Management System in Selected Philippine National Government Agencies

Assessment and Policy Recommendations

Bibliographic Data

ID6040358
AuthorsAdor R Torneo (0000-0002-6748-6987, Office of the Governor, corresponding author), Brian J Mojica (University of Management and Technology)
Year2020
Volume12
Issue3
Pages432-454
Publication date2020-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Politics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1943-0787 • E-ISSN: 1943-0779
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/aspp.12540
OpenAlexW3087667792
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited27

This study assessed the Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) based on a systematic review and synthesis of its implementation in selected Philippine national government agencies, specifically the Department of Interior and Local Government, the Department of Education, and the Commission on Higher Education. It provides an overview, discusses the cultural and administrative context, summarizes previous assessments done from 2013 to 2017, and offers recommendations. Overall, SPMS is theoretically viable but has several flaws preventing effective implementation in these agencies. To mitigate adverse effects, SPMS should be redesigned to appeal to intrinsic motivators and focus on individual improvement. Performance management processes should be streamlined, and a more agile methodology adopted. In the long term, the SPMS should be updated over time so that it aligns well with Filipino culture and the goals of the Philippine bureaucracy

Agile software development · Appeal · Bureaucracy · Business · Commission · Context (archaeology · Economics · Government (linguistics · Management · Performance Management · Political science · Politics · Process management · Public relations · Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management · Public Administration · Finance · Marketing

Tools

Open DOI