Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Government Reform, Political Ideology, and Administrative Burden

The Case of Performance Management in the Bush Administration

Bibliographic Data

ID6360889
AuthorsStéphane Lavertu (0000-0003-3971-3035, The Ohio State University), David E Lewis (0000-0002-0803-0074, Vanderbilt University), Donald P Moynihan (0000-0003-4097-6908, University of Wisconsin–Madison)
Year2013
Volume73
Issue6
Pages845-857
Publication date2013-10-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/puar.12132
OpenAlexW2121987934
LanguageEN
Citations received27
References cited40

This article examines how ideological differences between political officials and agencies may have affected the implementation of an ostensibly nonpartisan, government‐wide administrative initiative: the George W. Bush administration's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) review of federal programs. The analysis reveals that managers in agencies associated with liberal programs and employees (“liberal agencies”) agreed to a greater extent than those in agencies associated with conservative programs and employees (“conservative agencies”) that PART required significant agency time and effort and that it imposed a burden on management resources. Further analysis reveals that differences in reported agency effort can be explained partly by objective differences in the demands that PART placed on agencies—liberal agencies were required to evaluate more programs and implement more improvement plans relative to their organizational capacity—and partly by the ideological beliefs of employees—on average, liberal managers reported more agency effort, even after accounting for objective measures of administrative burden

Administration (probate law · Agency (philosophy · Business · Government (linguistics · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Exploring the dysfunctional consequences of performance evaluation systems

    Youngmin Oh•Public Management Review•2024

  • How quality reporting reduces accountability deficit and overload

    Yousueng Han, Shui Yan Tang•Public Management Review•2022

  • Can’t buy me love? An experiment on the relationship between federal grant spending and public approval of federal agencies

    Laine P Shay, Jason S Byers•Public Management Review•2024

  • Loyalty or Competence

    Open Access•Sounman Hong, Youngrok Kim et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • How electoral incentives shape performance measurement efforts

    Open Access•Susan M Miller•Public Administration•2017

  • Cultural Theory and Managerial Values

    Open Access•Thaddieus W Conner, Matthew C Nowlin et al.•Public Administration•2015

  • Bureaucratic redundancy and administrative burden

    Open Access•Wei Xiong, Feng Wang et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Burdens, Sludge, Ordeals, Red tape, Oh My

    Open Access•Jonas Krogh Madsen, Kim Sass Mikkelsen et al.•Public Administration•2020

  • How Can Scholars Help to Embed Institutions of Public-Sector Change? (Or Things I Wish I’d Known When I Was a Grad Student)

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Making Sense of Performance Regimes

    Open Access•Mads Leth Jakobsen, Martin Baekgaard et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2017

  • Conceptual Bases of Employee Accountability

    Open Access•Yousueng Han, James L Perry•Perspectives on Public Management…•2019

  • The ontology, origin, and impact of divisive public sector rules

    Open Access•Jesse W Campbell, Sanjay K Pandey et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Political ideology and information technology in government online communication

    Open Access•Nic Depaula•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Striped Pants versus Fat Cats

    Open Access•Evan T Haglund•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Contracts, Agency Vulnerability, and the Allocation of Federal Funds

    Open Access•Stuart Kasdin, Luona Lin•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • Explaining Burden Reduction in Municipal Service Delivery

    Open Access•Shan Zhou, Emma Mast•Public Administration Review•2026

  • Working Within a System of Administrative Burden

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Kylie Smith•Administration & Society•2022

  • Party Government and Administrative Reform

    Open Access•Alexander Götz, Florian Grotz et al.•Administration & Society•2018

  • Bureaucratic Investments in Expertise

    Simon Calmar Andersen, Donald P Moynihan•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Performance Management Meets Red Tape

    Open Access•Sounman Hong•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Tools of Control? Comparing Congressional and Presidential Performance Management Reforms

    Open Access•Alexander Kroll, Donald P Moynihan•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street‐Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Ani Ter‐mkrtchyan et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Regulating Public Services

    Open Access•Heike Döring, James Downe et al.•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Performance Management Routines That Work? An Early Assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan, Alexander Kroll•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Successful Problem Solvers? Managerial Performance Information Use to Improve Low Organizational Performance

    Open Access•Jakob Majlund Holm•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • Transactional Authority and Bureaucratic Politics

    Diane M Carpenter, D Carpenter et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • The Strategic Performance Management System in Selected Philippine National Government Agencies

    Open Access•Ador R Torneo, Brian J Mojica•Asian Politics & Policy•2020

  • Politics, Delegation, and Bureaucracy

    John D Huber, Charles R Shipan•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • What Motivates Bureaucrats?

    Marissa Martino Golden•What motivates bureaucrats?•2000

  • Taming the Bureaucracy

    William T Gormley, William T Jr Gormley•Taming the Bureaucracy•1989

  • Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State

    DAVID G FREDERICKSON, H George Frederickson•Measuring The Performance of the…•2006

  • The Politics of Presidential Appointments

    David E Lewis•Politics of Presidential…•2008

  • Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems

    Open Access•Carolyn J Heinrich, Gerald Marschke•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2009

  • National Performance Mandates and Intergovernmental Collaboration

    Open Access•Odd J Stalebrink•The American Review of Public…•2008

  • Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies

    Open Access•L W Isaac, Joel D Aberbach et al.•Bureaucrats and Politicians in…•1981

  • The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan, Alasdair Roberts et al.•Public Administration Review•2010

  • The Effect of Administrative Burden on Bureaucratic Perception of Policies

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden et al.•Public Administration Review•2012

  • How Credible Is the Evidence, and Does It Matter? An Analysis of the Program Assessment Rating Tool

    Open Access•Carolyn J Heinrich•Public Administration Review•2011

  • The Obama Administration and PBB

    Open Access•Philip G Joyce•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and Part

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Playing the Wrong Part

    Open Access•Joseph White•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Sharpening a Knife Cleverly

    Open Access•Robert F Durant•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s Part Scores

    Open Access•John B Gilmour, David E Lewis•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Operationalizing the Constitution Via Administrative Reorganization

    James L Garnett•Public Administration Review•1987

  • Toward Assessing the Administrative Presidency

    Robert F Durant•Public Administration Review•1987

  • Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, David E Lewis•Political Analysis•2008

  • Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design

    Open Access•James C Clingermayer•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • Factors behind Organizational Learning from Benchmarking

    Jostein Askim, Åge Johnsen et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • What Motivates Bureaucrats

    Hal G Rainey•Journal of Public Administration…•2002

  • Why Part? The Institutional Politics of Presidential Budget Reform

    Matthew Dull•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB

    John B Gilmour, David E Lewis•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • The Consequences of Presidential Patronage for Federal Agency Performance

    N Gallo, Natalya D Gallo et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Agency Political Ideology and Reform Implementation

    Stéphane Lavertu, Lavertu et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • Civil Service Reforms in Italy

    Open Access•Daniela Cristofoli, Greta Nasi et al.•Governance•2011

  • Political‐Administrative Relations

    Open Access•Kwang‐hoon Lee, Lee Kwanghoon et al.•Governance•2008

  • New Political Governance in Westminster Systems

    Open Access•Peter Aucoin•Governance•2012

  • Separated Powers in the United States

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, Anthony M Bertelli et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Political Appointees and the Competence of Federal Program Management

    Open Access•John B Gilmour, David E Lewis•American Politics Research•2006

  • The Study of Administration

    Open Access•Woodrow Wilson•Political Science Quarterly•1887

Unique citing works27
Citations per year2,45
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 27

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae