Semiotic Identities in Archaeology
The Politics of Interpretation Introduction to Archaeological Identitiscapes: A Semiotic Stance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6045262 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mauro Puddu (0000-0003-2328-3747, University for Foreigners of Siena, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-9 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-7743 • E-ISSN: 1474-0540 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0959774325100139 |
| OpenAlex | W4416407964 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
Identity is a permanent integral feature of archaeological research. Even when it seems marginal to the current archaeological agenda, identity is brought back into the discussion by the urgency to engage with—often homogenizing—identity-based policies in contemporary politics. Lately, the emphasis placed on difference, fluidity and multivocality within archaeology has sensibly advanced the debate. Nevertheless, immutable identities continue to arise in studies of antiquity, replicating essentialist assumptions on the human past built around binary structures and simplistic equations of culture-historical reminiscence between material culture/practices and identities. The contributors to this special issue show how informing archaeological discourse with a semiotic methodology enhances the visibility of social dynamism, cultural complexities, among ancient human groups. This is particularly true for the communities silenced by history. These papers push the ontological and epistemological boundaries of archaeology by envisaging the archaeological record as a set of interconnected signs, whose cognitive potential overcomes the material space they occupy so that they become meaningful to different individuals and communities in diverse ways. Their stance maintains that semiotics holds the largely unexplored potential to enhance our understanding of the complexity of the past, ultimately offering a compelling standpoint to engage with contemporary identity-centred political debates
Archaeological record · Essentialism · Politics · Semiotics · Social semiotics · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Archaeology, Nation, and Race
Mapping Collaborations
Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia
Symbolic and Structural Archaeology
The Subject and Power
‘Contextual archaeology’ revisited
Archaeological Semiotics
Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method
The Indian behind the Artefact or Things behind the Process
Historicising Material Agency
Roman Failure
Introduction to “Binary Binds”
Assembling Past Worlds
The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities
Black Feminist Archaeology
The Archaeology of Identities
Forum
Subaltern Debris
Finding Difference in Emotional Communities
Can We Decolonize the Ancient Past? Bridging Postcolonial and Decolonial Theory in Sudanese and Nubian Archaeology
Neolithization and Population Replacement in Britain
The Predicament of Ontology
New Materialism and Posthumanism in Roman Archaeology
Bodily Entanglements
Mark Making and Human Becoming
On Semiotic Ideology
Representation and materiality in archaeology
The Emperor's New Clothes? The Utility of Identity in Roman Archaeology
Converting to rice
Making posthumanist kin in the past
Ancient DNA, kinship and relational identities in Bronze Age Britain
Material habits, identity, semeiotic
Peirce and Archaeology
Palestine is our working condition
Ceci n'est pas un subalterne. A Comment on Indigenous Erasure in Ontology-Related Archaeologies
Beyond binaries. Interrogating ancient DNA
The strange afterlife of biodeterministic imagination
Understanding objects in motion. Anarchaeologicaldialogue on Romanization
The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist
Entangled
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |