Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doing of gender and scientific knowledge production

Bibliographic Data

ID6058238
AuthorsUlla Eriksson‐zetterquist (0000-0002-9479-9743, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume32
Issue2
Pages217-222
Publication date2013-02-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEqual Opportunities International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-7093 • E-ISSN: 2040-7149
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/02610151311324433
OpenAlexW2022122203
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to enable the author to discuss some personal experiences from research and teaching that relate to the special circumstances of doing gender research. Design/methodology/approach When reading about Styhre's and Tienari's experiences, the author is not so surprised by but rather concerned about the resemblance and reflections evoked by the text vis‐à‐vis her own experiences of doing research in the gender field. During recent decades, she had the opportunity to explore various organizing issues in her research, from technology and organizational change to gender and intersectionality. This provided her with both an inside and outside perspective on some of the specificities which recur in the field of gender studies. Findings Doing gender research enables men and women to “become with” women, men and other people. When able to respond to other people with respect, the researcher can “become with” the studied one. By going into the experiences previously shared by other scholars doing gender studies, and by reflecting upon these, the opportunities for men and women to “become with” will most likely increase. Originality/value In a performative way, “doing gender” includes a way of recognizing the context in which the author is situated. When this position is challenged, things start to happen. Whether one is being challenged as a woman, as a man, as a researcher, or for not understanding gender in the proper feminist way, the conditions of one's comprehension of doing gender are called into question. Reflexivity is thus – as Styhre and Tienari claim – a product of social encounters

Comprehension · Doing gender · Epistemology · Linguistics · Originality · Performative utterance · Political science · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Situated · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Psychology

  • Men in context

    Open Access•Alexander Styhre, Janne Tienari et al.•Equal Opportunities International•2014

  • From ‘the Woman's’ Point of View

    Marta Β Calás, Marta B Calás et al.•Studying organization•2012

  • Molnet - att föreläsa om feministisk forskning

    Open Access•Anna Wahl•Tidskrift för genusvetenskap•1996

  • Self‐reflexivity scrutinized

    Open Access•Alexander Styhre, Janne Tienari•Equal Opportunities International•2013

  • The Postmodern Condition

    Jean-François Lyotard, Geoff Bennington et al.•1984

  • Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies

    Open Access•Joan Acker•Gender & Society•1990

  • Doing Gender

    Open Access•Candace West, Don H Zimmerman•Gender & Society•1987

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2014 - 2014 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae