Jobs, Wealth, or Place
The Faces of Community Economic Development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6077202 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Giloth (0000-0002-6506-0616, Annie E. Casey Foundation, corresponding author), Robert P Giloth |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 11-27 |
| Publication date | 1998-06-23 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Community Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1070-5422 • E-ISSN: 1543-3706 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1300/j125v05n01_02 |
| OpenAlex | W2021485039 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 11 |
Multiple and conflicting practices characterize the field of community economic development. Much of the debate about these practices revolves around different understandings of the importance of jobs, wealth, and place. No overarching definition, typology, or theory, however, offers a plausible way to resolve these conflicts about community economic development goals, levers of change, and practices. One promising approach engages the complexity rather than trying to simplify it. Metaphors are multivalent images that call attention to crosscutting issues, underlying assumptions, and hidden connections. Metaphors enable a richer and more creative reading of neighborhoods and economies when used in planning and design. This article explores six metaphors with relevance for community economic development: plugging the leaks, brokering connections, asset management, building ladders and webs, creating level playing fields, and enhancing markets. How to support this complex version of community economic development challenges the ways in which we encourage innovation, investment, and learning
Asset (computer security · Business · Community development · Economic growth · Economics · Field (mathematics · Investment (military · Metaphor · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Reading (process · Relevance (law · Sociology · Typology · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science
| Citations per year | 0.15 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2000 - 2014 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |