Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is the Process the Only Punishment

Racial–Ethnic Disparities in Lower‐Level Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID6090657
AuthorsN Petersen (0000-0002-3097-2885, University of Miami), Marisa Omori (0000-0002-9929-4349, University of Missouri–St. Louis)
Year2020
Volume42
Issue1
Pages56-77
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lapo.12140
OpenAlexW2997957351
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited61

Although misdemeanors make up the bulk of criminal cases in the United States, the majority of research on court decision‐making examines felony sentencing. In contrast to felony courts, lower‐level courts are characterized by higher case volumes and increased reliance on informal sanctions, which may contribute to greater racial–ethnic disparities. To assess this possibility, we examine pretrial detention and case processing outcomes for misdemeanants in Miami‐Dade County, Florida. Utilizing temporal (detention time) and monetary (bond amount) measures of pretrial detention, we assess whether and to what extent there are racial–ethnic disparities in formal and informal sanctions facing misdemeanants. Results indicate that black defendants, especially black Latinx defendants, face greater informal sanctions (longer detention and higher bond amounts), are more likely to be convicted, and experience more severe formal sanctions than do white non‐Latinx defendants. These findings complicate Feeley's (1979) argument about lower‐level cases, revealing that black defendants are punished by both the court process and formal sanctions. In this way, “the process is the punishment” for lower‐level white and nonwhite defendants, while the punishment is also the punishment for black defendants

Criminal justice · Criminology · Ethnic group · Political science · Punishment (psychology · Sanctions · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology

  • Political Ideology and Attitudes Toward Pretrial Justice

    Stacie St Louis, N Petersen•Justice Quarterly•2025

  • Disparities in the Pretrial Process

    William M Casey, Jennifer E Copp et al.•Justice Quarterly•2024

  • Who Minds Their Pleas and Queues? Quick and Slow Misdemeanor Pleas Pose Similar Risk of Incarceration

    Open Access•Rebecca Richardson, Miko M Wilford•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2026

  • Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases

    Open Access•N Petersen, Stacie St Louis•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2025

  • Is There a (Pre)Trial Penalty? Assessing the Joint Impacts of Pretrial Detention and Trial Conviction on Sentencing

    Open Access•Stacie St Louis, Marlena G Bolton et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • The Conditional Impacts of Organizations and Supervisors on the Tension Between Officers and Citizens

    Open Access•Gwanseob Shin, Yong-Chan Rhee et al.•Law & Policy•2026

  • Don't Call It a Comeback

    Issa Kohler‐hausmann•Annual Review of Criminology•2022

  • The More You Do through This Program, the Better It’s Going to Look in Court’

    Open Access•Alyssa Leblond•The British Journal of Criminology•2026

  • Procedural Violence in Chinese Criminal Courtrooms

    Open Access•Sitao Li•The British Journal of Criminology•2025

  • Case dismissal and noncarceral sentences

    Open Access•Richard D Hartley, M S Tillyer et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2025

  • Program outcomes in a light-touch prosecutor-led misdemeanor diversion program

    Open Access•Alexa Cinque, Matthew Epperson et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2025

  • Justice and Parental Blameworthiness

    Open Access•Elizabeth Borland, Mary Nell Trautner et al.•Law & Policy•2025

  • Patchwork disclosure

    Open Access•Juan R Sandoval, Sarah Lageson•Law & Policy•2022

  • Courtroom workgroup dynamics and implementation of Three Strikes reform

    Open Access•Elsa Y Chen, Emily Chung et al.•Law & Policy•2024

  • The Impact of Colorism on Criminal Justice System Outcomes

    Open Access•Tonisha Jones•Journal of Black Studies•2025

  • Misdemeanorland

    Issa Kohler-Hausmann, Issa Kohler‐hausmann•Misdemeanorland•2018

  • Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data

    Open Access•Alan Agresti•Analysis of Ordinal Categorical…•2010

  • Marked

    Devah Pager•Marked•2007

  • Patterns of Racial Diversity and Segregation in the United States

    Richard Wright, Mark Ellis et al.•The Professional Geographer•2014

  • Opening Pandora’s Box

    Besiki Luka Kutateladze, Nancy Rita Andiloro et al.•Justice Quarterly•2016

  • Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates

    Doris J James, Lauren E Glaze•PsycEXTRA Dataset•2006

  • Risk as a Proxy for Race

    Bernard E Harcourt•Federal Sentencing Reporter•2015

  • Race and disparities in sentencing

    Cassia Spohn, Jerry Cederblom•Justice Quarterly•1991

  • The Effects of Pre-Trial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment

    Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin et al.•American Economic Review•2018

  • Banished

    Katherine Beckett, Steve Herbert•Banished•2009

  • Building the Prison State

    Heather Schoenfeld•Building the Prison State•2017

  • Global Edge

    Open Access•A Portes, Ariel C Armony•Global Edge•2018

  • Crook County

    NICOLE GONZALEZ VAN CLEVE•Crook County: Racism and…•2020

  • Governing Through Crime

    Jonathan Simon•Governing through Crime•2007

  • Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing

    Eric P Baumer•Justice Quarterly•2012

  • The role of bail and pretrial detention in the reproduction of racial inequalities

    Open Access•Michael Menefee•Sociology Compass•2018

  • Misdemeanors

    Alexandra Natapoff•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2015

  • Attenuating Disparities Through Four Areas of Change

    Open Access•Traci Schlesinger•Criminology & Public Policy•2015

  • Twentieth‐Century Sentencing Reform Movement

    Open Access•Cassia Spohn•Criminology & Public Policy•2014

  • Deadly Symbiosis

    Open Access•L Wacquant•Punishment & Society•2001

  • Pre-trial detention and guilty pleas

    Open Access•Elsa Euvrard, Chloé Leclerc•Punishment & Society•2016

  • Mass probation

    Open Access•Michelle S Phelps•Punishment & Society•2016

  • The delayed emergence of penal modernism in Florida

    Open Access•Heather Schoenfeld•Punishment & Society•2014

  • Shifting and targeted forms of penal governance

    Open Access•Kelly Hannah‐moffat, Kelly Hannah-Moffat et al.•Theoretical Criminology•2012

  • Remaking white residential segregation

    Mark Ellis, Richard Wright et al.•Urban Geography•2017

  • From ’Rabble Management’ to ’Recovery Management’

    Open Access•Forrest Stuart•Urban Studies•2014

  • Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, Chester L Britt et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2001

  • Ethnicity Effects on Sentence Outcomes in Large Urban Courts

    Open Access•Stephen Demuth, Darrell Steffensmeier•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing

    Open Access•Darrell Steffensmeier, J T Ulmer et al.•Criminology•1998

  • Race, Drugs, and Policing

    Open Access•Katherine Beckett, Kris Nyrop et al.•Criminology•2006

  • Cumulative Disadvantage

    Open Access•Besiki Luka Kutateladze, Nancy Rita Andiloro et al.•Criminology•2014

  • The New Jim Crow

    M M Alexander, Michelle Alexander•New Jim Crow•2020

  • Remand for Plea. Bail Decisions and Plea Bargaining as Commensurate Decisions

    Gail Kellough•The British Journal of Criminology•2002

  • Eroding the Presumption of Innocence

    Nicole M Myers•The British Journal of Criminology•2017

  • Pressures to Plead Guilty

    Kevin Kwok‐yin Cheng, K K-y Cheng•The British Journal of Criminology•2013

  • The Paradox of Probation

    Open Access•Michelle S Phelps•Law & Policy•2013

  • Crack Pipes and Policing

    Open Access•Mona Lynch•Law & Policy•2011

  • US Criminal Justice Policy and Practice in the Twenty‐First Century

    Open Access•Katherine Beckett, Lindsey Beach et al.•Law & Policy•2018

  • The Penology of Racial Innocence

    Open Access•Naomi Murakawa, Katherine Beckett•Law & Society Review•2010

  • Race and Cumulative Discrimination in the Prosecution of Criminal Defendants

    Open Access•Lisa Stolzenberg, Stewart J D’alessio et al.•Race and Justice•2013

  • Incarceration and Stratification

    Wakefield, Christopher Uggen•Annual Review of Sociology•2010

  • Misdemeanor Justice

    Issa Kohler-Hausmann, Issa Kohler‐hausmann•American Journal of Sociology•2013

  • Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants

    John R Sutton•Social Science Research•2013

Unique citing works15
Citations per year3,75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae