Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Compliance

Digital Piracy, Deterrence, Social Norms, and Duty in China and the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID6090670
AuthorsBenjamin Van Rooij (0000-0003-4300-0716, University of California, Irvine), Adam Fine, Adam D Fine (0000-0002-7029-0731, University of California, Irvine), Yanyan Zhang (0000-0002-0933-3253, Jilin University), Yunmei Wu
Year2017
Volume39
Issue1
Pages73-93
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lapo.12071
OpenAlexW2523782631
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited59

The study of compliance has been predominantly Western, and we do not know whether existing theories and findings also apply elsewhere. As a first venture in developing a comparative view on compliance, this study seeks to gain a comparative understanding of compliance decision making among Chinese and American students. It studies their decisions in response to two scenarios that offer an opportunity to use pirated online content. It tests how their decisions are shaped by subjective deterrence, social norms, and perceived duty to obey the law, comparing a control group with a group who received an explicit deterrence message from a strong campaign targeting the use of pirated digital content. The results indicate that, regardless of the explicit enforcement context, Chinese students' inclination to engage in digital piracy hinges chiefly on the perceived behavior and approval of others. This stands in contrast to US students. Within an explicit enforcement context, both social norms and perceived enforcement affect US students' decision making, whereas when there is no explicit enforcement context, both social norms and perceived duty to obey the law affect decision making. This study thus provides a warning that compliance theories and findings may not generalize well beyond the Western context. This necessitates the development of comparative compliance studies and more cross‐national replication

Affect (linguistics · Business · Compliance (psychology · Context (archaeology · Deterrence (psychology · Deterrence theory · Duty · Enforcement · Political science · Public relations · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology

  • Perceived Formal and Informal Sanctions in Deterring Cybercrime in a College Sample

    Open Access•Adam M Bossler•Journal of Contemporary Criminal…•2021

  • Deterrence and defiance as responses to copyright enforcement policies of digital content

    Open Access•Dario Miocevic•Information Technology and People•2023

  • Consumers’ responses to opposing copyright enforcement regimes

    Open Access•Dario Miocevic•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Understanding the state of criminological scholarship on cybercrimes

    Open Access•Thomas J Holt•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • Does Criminal Experience Affect a Person’s Perceptual Deterrence of Sanctions and Controlling Mechanisms in China

    Open Access•Shanhe Jiang, Xin Jiang et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2025

  • Certainty, But How Certain? Severity, But How Severe? A Quasi-Experimental Study on Digital Piracy Deterrence in a Spanish Citizens Sample

    Open Access•Ana B Gómez-Bellvís, Alex R Piquero et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • How ethical and political identifications drive adaptive behavior in the digital piracy context

    Open Access•Dario Miocevic, Ivana Kursan Milaković•Business Ethics, the Environment…•2023

  • It takes a village to build illegality

    Open Access•Anat Gofen, Galit Cohen-Blankshtain et al.•Governance•2021

  • Determinants of digital piracy using deterrence, social learning and neutralization perspectives

    Byung Lee, Byung Moo Lee et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Piracy and the State

    Open Access•Martin K Dimitrov, Martin Dimitrov•Piracy and the State•2009

  • China's Long March toward Rule of Law

    Open Access•Randall Peerenboom•China's Long March Toward Rule of…•2002

  • Managing social norms for persuasive impact

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini, Linda J Demaine et al.•Social Influence•2006

  • Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing

    Open Access•Krista Casler, Lydia Bickel et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2013

  • Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect

    Open Access•Greg Pogarsky, Alex R Piquero•Journal of Research in Crime and…•2003

  • Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Psychometrika•2007

  • Culture and Organizations

    Geert Hofstede•International Studies of…•1980

  • Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Current Directions in Psychological…•2003

  • The application of vignettes in social and nursing research

    Open Access•Rhidian Hughes, Meg Huby•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2002

  • Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime

    Open Access•R Apel•Journal of Quantitative Criminology•2013

  • Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment

    Open Access•Fons Van De Vijver, Norbert K Tanzer•European Review of Applied…•2004

  • Retracted

    Open Access•Lisa L Shu, Nina Mazar et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • The “Criminology of the Corporation” and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies

    Robert A Kagan, John T Scholz•Enforcing Regulation•1984

  • Inside the Turk

    Open Access•Gabriele Paolacci, Joan Chandler et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2014

  • Most people are not Weird

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Nature•2010

  • Amazon's Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Michael D Buhrmester, Michael Buhrmester et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2011

  • Social Influence

    Robert B Cialdini, Noah J Goldstein•Annual Review of Psychology•2004

  • Why People Obey the Law

    T R Tyler•Why People Obey the Law•2006

  • Legal Punishment, Social Disapproval and Internalization as Inhibitors of Illegal Behavior

    Harold G Grasmick, Donald E Green•The Journal of Criminal Law and…•1980

  • Perceptual Research on General Deterrence

    Open Access•Kirk R Williams, Richard Hawkins•Law & Society Review•1986

  • Explaining and sustaining the crime drop

    Open Access•Graham Farrell, Nick Tilley et al.•Crime Prevention and Community…•2010

  • The Challenge of Empirical Research on Business Compliance in Regulatory Capitalism

    C Parker, Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2009

  • The reversal effect of prohibition signs

    Open Access•Kees Keizer, Lindenberg et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2011

  • Weak Enforcement, Strong Deterrence

    Open Access•Benjamin Van Rooij•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research

    Shadd Maruna, H Copes•Crime and Justice•2005

  • Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century

    Daniel S Nagin•Crime and Justice•2013

  • The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behavior

    Open Access•Henk Elffers, Russell H Weigel et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•1987

  • Crime and Punishment

    Gary S Becker•Journal of Political Economy•1968

  • Traits and States

    Open Access•Jean‐louis Van Gelder, Reinout E De Vries•Criminology•2012

  • Perceptual Deterrence Among Active Residential Burglars

    Open Access•Scott Decker, Richard Wright et al.•Criminology•1993

  • Culture and the self

    Hazel Rose Markus, Shinobu Kitayama•Psychological Review•1991

  • China's Changing of the Guard

    Open Access•Andrew J Nathan•Journal of democracy•2003

  • General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior

    Open Access•Dorothy Thornton, Neil Gunningham et al.•Law & Policy•2005

  • Contextual Compliance

    Open Access•Huiqi Yan, Benjamin Van Rooij et al.•Law & Policy•2015

  • The Validity of Crowdsourcing Data in Studying Anger and Aggressive Behavior

    Johannes Lutz•Social Psychology•2016

  • Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research

    Open Access•Gary King, Christopher J L Murray et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

  • The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity of Punishment

    Harold G Grasmick, George J Bryjak•Social Forces•1980

  • The Vignette Technique in Survey Research

    Open Access•Janet Finch•Sociology•1987

  • Individualism-Collectivism

    Open Access•Yvonne A Fjneman, Madde E Willemsen et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1996

  • Peering into the "Magnum Mysterium" of Culture

    Open Access•Garriy Shteynberg, Michele J Gelfand et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2009

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,29
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae