How do institutional gender regimes affect formal reporting processes for sexual harassment? A qualitative study of UK higher education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6090701 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Bull (0000-0003-2732-3240, Department of Education University of York York UK, corresponding author), Erin R Shannon (0000-0002-4765-4576, Department of Education University of York York UK) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Law & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-8240 • E-ISSN: 1467-9930 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/lapo.12255 |
| OpenAlex | W4403272464 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 45 |
Formal complaints and disciplinary processes constitute a mandatory aspect of organizational responses for addressing sexual harassment in many jurisdictions. However, previous research has found that reporting parties are not well served by such processes. In particular, Ahmed (Complaint!; 2021) argues that the institutional climate that enables harassment or discrimination to occur—including its gendered dynamics—also shapes how complaints about harassment are handled. Building on Ahmed's work, this article analyses how gender “gets into” formal reporting processes for sexual harassment within organizations. It draws on interviews with 18 students and staff who went through a formal institutional reporting process for gender‐based violence or harassment in UK higher education between 2016 and 2021. Using Connell's theorization of “gender regimes,” we outline how “dimensions of gender” within organizations affected different stages of formal reporting processes, including how evidence was gathered during reporting processes, as well as how it was assessed. These findings demonstrate that gender regimes—via gender relations of power, gendered “attachments and investments,” and “gender‐neutral” processes—can override formal processes and affect outcomes of sexual harassment reporting. These findings explain how gender regimes contribute to the failure of sexual harassment complaints to be upheld within organizations
Affect (linguistics · Business · Demographic economics · Economics · Harassment · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Communication · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology · Accounting
Research relationalities
Breaking the silence
Cuándo está localizada la investigación? Eurocentrismo en la investigación sobre violencia sexual(izada) en educación superior. El contexto indonesio
Institutional responses to harassment in academia
Power, institutional protectionism and the disinclination of minoritised employees to raise complaints in UK universities
Theorizing Patriarchy Against a Backdrop of Workplace Sexism and Stress in UK Academia
Legacies of #MeToo in the UK film and television industry
Exploring Implementation of Gender-Based Violence Policies in English Higher Education
Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations
Workplace Sexual Harassment 30 Years on
Institutional betrayal.
Learning from survivors
Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology
Catalysts and rationales for reporting staff sexual misconduct to UK higher education institutions
Unwilling trust
Severe and Pervasive? Consequences of Sexual Harassment for Graduate Students and their Title IX Report Outcomes
Coaches, sexual harassment and education
The Governance of Complaints in UK Higher Education
Reckoning up
Students’ accounts of grooming and boundary-blurring behaviours by academic staff in UK higher education
Protecting the perpetrator
Below the “tip of the iceberg”
Challenging anti-carceral feminism
Seeking campus justice
Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions
Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksites
Sex-based harassment and organizational silencing
Binary logics and the discursive interpretation of organizational policy
I Can Protect His Future, but She Can’t Be Helped
Sexual harassment in academic spaces
The illusion of choice
You Can Knock on the Doors and Windows of the University, but Nobody Will Care
Joining up well-being and sexual misconduct data and policy in HE
Holding on' in a crisis
Internal Dispute Resolution
Sexual and sexist harassment in Spanish universities
Gendering the middle classes
Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |