Analyzing the Ethical Implications of Research Using Leaked Data
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6096068 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne E Boustead (0000-0002-1028-0435, University of Arizona), Trey Herr (0000-0002-3344-9280, Atlantic Council) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 505-509 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096520000323 |
| OpenAlex | W3041647388 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 12 |
Although information made public after a data breach can provide insight into difficult research questions, use of these data raises ethical questions not directly addressed by current ethical guidelines. This article develops a framework for identifying and managing risks to human subjects when conducting research involving leaked data. We contend that researchers who seek to use leaked data should identify and address ethical challenges by considering the process through which the data were originally released into the public domain
Data curation · Data science · Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Geography · Internet privacy · Political science · Public domain · Research Data · Research ethics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
The Ethical and Legal Dilemmas of Digital Accountability Research and the Utility of International Norm-Setting
The Provenance Problem
H-1B Visas and Wages in Accounting
Basic Psychological Needs Are Associated With Engagement and Hate Term Use in Extremist Chatrooms
Ethical conundrums
Can political economists trace secretive processes? Insights from the case of oil politics and policies in Uganda
Ethnic stacking in the Russian armed forces? Findings from a leaked dataset
Voting for a Killer
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |