Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When Ideology Trumps Deliberation

Evidence from Chile’s 2022 Constitutional Proposal

Bibliographic Data

ID6097735
AuthorsRené Tapia (0000-0001-7844-3504, Universitat de Barcelona, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume59
Issue1
Pages1-5
Publication date2025-11-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096525101601
OpenAlexW4416156256
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

Existing research on Chile’s 2022 constitution-making process primarily explained the negative referendum outcome through individual-level factors. The role of political parties in responding to the product of deliberation has been widely overlooked. This article addresses that gap by examining party reactions to the draft constitution, a proposal aligned with the left-wing constitutional project of New Latin American Constitutionalism. Although the proposal embodied this project, party responses proved far more ambivalent, especially in the center-left, where party endorsement often was conditional. This ambivalence weakened the approval campaign and proved decisive in the referendum’s rejection. The analysis underscores that partisan ideology matters in deliberative constitution-making

Ambivalence · Constitution · Deliberation · Ideology · Politics · Referendum · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Politics and Society in Latin America · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

  • Writings acts and protest actions

    Open Access•Jean-Pierre Reed, Rodrigo Anselmo Asún et al.•Critical Sociology•2026

  • It’s the procedures, stupid

    Open Access•T Ginsburg, I Álvarez•Global Constitutionalism•2023

  • Utopian constitutionalism in Chile

    Open Access•David Landau, Rosalind Dixon•Global Constitutionalism•2023

  • How not to write a constitution

    Open Access•Guillermo Larraín, Gabriel L Negretto et al.•Public Choice•2023

  • Why political parties use deliberation

    Open Access•Gherghina, Vincent Jacquet•Acta Politica•2023

  • Too little, too vague

    Open Access•Gherghina, Bettina Mitru•Politics•2025

  • Writing a constitution without parties? The programmatic weakness of party-voter linkages in the Chilean political change

    Open Access•Fabián Belmar, Mauricio Morales Quiroga et al.•Politics•2025

  • Deliberative forums in fragile contexts

    Open Access•Nicole Curato, Septrin John Calamba et al.•Politics•2024

  • The perception of insecurity and vote choice in national referendums

    Open Access•Santiago Berg Bilbao, Patricio Navia•Politics•2025

  • The Chilean Constitutional Convention

    Open Access•Adriana Suárez Delucchi•Global Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Democratic innovations and political parties

    Rodrigo Ramis-Moyano•Contemporary Politics•2025

  • Religious Voting in a Secularised Country

    Open Access•Mauricio Morales Quiroga•Secularism and Nonreligion•2024

  • In Pinochet's Shadows

    Open Access•Sergio Fuenzalida Gauna, Patricio Navia et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae