Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving Social Science

Lessons from the Open Science Movement

Bibliographic Data

ID6100352
AuthorsPer Engzell (0000-0002-2404-6308, Stockholm University), Julia M Rohrer (0000-0001-8564-4523, Max Planck Institute for Human Development)
Year2021
Volume54
Issue2
Pages297-300
Publication date2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096520000967
OpenAlexW3034169274
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited33

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button

Art · Physics · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Mathematics · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • How (Not) to Reproduce

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Simon Heuberger•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • A data-driven and generalizable model for classifying outdoor recreation opportunities at multiple spatial extents

    Open Access•Hongchao Zhang, Jordan W Smith•Landscape and Urban Planning•2023

  • Reflexivity in quantitative research

    Open Access•Michelle Jamieson, Michelle K Jamieson et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2023

  • Problems of knowledge, problems of order

    Open Access•Liora O’donnell Goldensher•Frontiers in Sociology•2023

  • Building an ICCN Multimodal Classifier of Aggressive Political Debate Style

    Dhavan V Shah, Zhongkai Sun et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2023

  • Open Minds, Open Methods

    Open Access•Eike M Rinke, Alexander Wuttke•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • Understanding Patterns and Trends in Income Mobility through Multiverse Analysis

    Open Access•Per Engzell, Carina Mood•American Sociological Review•2023

  • Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

    Open Access•Leslie K John, G Loewenstein et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation

    Open Access•Julia M Rohrer•Advances in Methods and Practices…•2018

  • Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction

    Patrick E Shrout, Joseph L Rodgers•Annual Review of Psychology•2018

  • Psychology's Renaissance

    L D Nelson, Joseph P Simmons et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2018

  • Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress

    Open Access•Simine Vazire•Perspectives on Psychological…•2018

  • Measurement Schmeasurement

    Open Access•Jessica Flake, Eiko I Fried•Advances in Methods and Practices…•2020

  • Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

    Open Access•Daniel T Gilbert, Gary King et al.•Science•2016

  • The natural selection of bad science

    Open Access•P E Smaldino, Richard Mcelreath•Royal Society Open Science•2016

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Open Access•Open Science Collaboration•Science•2015

  • False-Positive Psychology

    Open Access•Joseph P Simmons, L D Nelson et al.•Psychological Science•2011

  • Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • How Transparency Affects Survey Responses

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Connors, Yanna Krupnikov et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Transparent Social Inquiry

    Colin Elman, Diana Kapiszewski et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Analytic Transparency, Radical Honesty, and Strategic Incentives

    Sean Yom•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Data Access, Transparency, and Replication

    Open Access•Daniel Stockemer, Sebastian Koehler et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Publication, Publication

    Open Access•Gary King•PS Political Science & Politics•2006

  • Standard Operating Procedures

    Open Access•Winston Lin, Winston T Lin et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2016

  • Reducing Political Bias in Political Science Estimates

    Open Access•Lawrence J Zigerell•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

  • Big Data, Causal Inference, and Formal Theory

    Open Access•William R Clark, Matt Golder•PS Political Science & Politics•2015

  • Replicate Others as You Would Like to Be Replicated Yourself

    Open Access•Nicole Janz, Jeremy Freese•PS Political Science & Politics•2021

  • The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use

    Open Access•Amy Orben, Andrew K Przybylski•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • A problem in theory

    Open Access•Michael Muthukrishna, J Henrich•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Open Access•Daniel J Benjamin, James O Berger et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump

    Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer•Leviathan and the Air-Pump•2011

  • Replication in Social Science

    Jeremy Freese, David Peterson•Annual Review of Sociology•2017

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,4
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae