Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump

Bibliographic Data

ID6101656
AuthorsMatthew C Macwilliams (University of Massachusetts Amherst, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume49
Issue4
Pages716-721
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096516001463
OpenAlexW2530159079
LanguageEN
Citations received93
References cited12

While the party decides theory explains the outcomes of past nomination battles for president, this year in the Republican presidential contest party insiders failed to anoint a standard bearer. Who decides when the party elites don’t? In 2016, it was America’s authoritarian voters. And their candidate of choice, Donald Trump, is anathema to party leaders. I argue that Trump’s rise is in part the result of authoritarian voters’ response to his unvarnished, us-versus-them rhetoric. The failure of Republican Party insiders to coalesce behind one candidate opened the door for Trump. Authoritarian-driven partisan polarization (Hetherington and Weiler 2009), increasing fear of real and imagined threats, and terrorist incidents abroad and at home provided the fuel for Trump’s campaign. And Trump’s message and manner ignited that fuel, propelling him to the Republican nomination for president

Adversary · Authoritarianism · Computer security · CONTEST · Democracy · Law and economics · Nomination · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Politics of the United States · Presidential system · Rhetoric · Sociology · Terrorism · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • Parties, Pluralism and the “Crisis” in American Representation

    Open Access•Craig Parsons, Till Weber•Chinese Political Science Review•2019

  • Conflicted by conservatism? Exploring authoritarian values, climate politics, and alternative energy funding public opinion in the United States

    Open Access•Christopher A Simon, Michael C Moltz•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • The Populist Radical Right in the US

    Open Access•Jeremy C Roberts•Politics and Governance•2020

  • A Democratic Dilemma

    Open Access•Emmitt Y Riley, Clarissa Peterson•Social Sciences•2024

  • Lessons from Brexit and Trump

    Open Access•Matthijs Bogaards•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2017

  • Technological vulnerability among the higher-educated

    Open Access•Carlo Knotz•European Political Science Review•2025

  • Who Wants to Make America Great Again? Understanding Evangelical Support for Donald Trump

    Open Access•Michele F Margolis•Politics and Religion•2020

  • Trump-ing Foreign Affairs

    Open Access•R M Blum, Christopher Sebastian Parker•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Are Stealth Democrats Really Committed to Democracy? Process Preferences Revisited

    Open Access•Andrew J Bloeser, Tarah Williams et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Does Hard Propaganda (Also) Work in Democracies? Evidence from the United States

    Open Access•Philipp M Lutscher, Karsten Donnay•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • How Much Is a Trump Endorsement Worth

    Open Access•M V Hood, Mv Hood et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • An Alternative Account of the Populist Backlash in the United States

    Open Access•Berk Esen, Şebnem Yardımcı-Geyikçi•PS Political Science & Politics•2019

  • Why Did Women Vote for Donald Trump

    Mark Setzler, Alixandra B Yanus•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Power Play

    Open Access•Susan Turner Hayne•PS Political Science & Politics•2019

  • Explaining the Trump Vote

    Marc Hooghe, Ruth Dassonneville•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Eroding Norms and Democratic Deconsolidation

    Open Access•P David Howe, Paul Howe•Journal of democracy•2017

  • Let's Call Ourselves the Super Elite”

    Open Access•Todd Nicholas Fuist, R H Williams•Sociological Forum•2019

  • Helping to Break the Glass Ceiling? Fathers, First Daughters, and Presidential Vote Choice in 2016

    Open Access•Jill S Greenlee, Tatishe M Nteta et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • A Tale of Two Democrats

    Julie Wronski, Alexa Bankert et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections

    George Ward, Jan‐emmanuel De Neve et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021

  • Television and the Cultivation of Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Michael Morgan, Jarrod Shanahan et al.•Journal of Communication•2017

  • The Right to Dominate

    Open Access•Roland Paris•International Organization•2020

  • No Longer the Only Game in Town? Immigration, Authoritarianism and the Future of Democracy in the West

    Open Access•Fatih U Cetin, Burak Demir•Government and Opposition•2025

  • Are Cultural and Economic Conservatism Positively Correlated? A Large-Scale Cross-National Test

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • Cultural Backlash

    Open Access•P Norris, Ronald Inglehart•Cultural Backlash•2019

  • The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice

    Open Access•Agnieszka Golec De Zavala, Rita Guerra et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • Authoritarianism and Political Conflict

    Stanley Feldman, Christel Weber et al.•Oxford Handbook of Political…•2023

  • Is There a Trump Effect? An Experiment on Political Polarization and Audience Costs

    Open Access•Miles M Evers, Aleksandr Fisher et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Economic Decline, Social Identity, and Authoritarian Values in the United States

    Open Access•Cameron Ballard-Rosa, Amalie Jensen et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Class Politics and the Authoritarian Personality

    Geoff M Boucher•International Critical Thought•2022

  • Voting like a boss

    Open Access•Erika Small, Anonymous Anonymous et al.•Organization Management Journal•2026

  • Las amenazas y la simpatía hacia candidatos autoritarios

    Open Access•Arturo Maldonado•Revista Latinoamericana de…•2020

  • Neoliberal logic in the United States and Turkey

    Open Access•Melodi Var Öngel, Brandin Ali et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2024

  • Culture and Democracy

    Waleed A Jami, Waleed Jami et al.•The Journal of Psychology•2022

  • Response to Morgan

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Socius Sociological Research for…•2018

  • The Rise or Decline of Social Acceptance? Perspective from U.S. Presidential Elections, 2012 to 2020

    Open Access•Kyle Dodson, Clem Brooks•Socius Sociological Research for…•2024

  • Bitchifying Hillary

    Open Access•Kristen Erichsen, Douglas Schrock et al.•Social Currents•2020

  • Religion and the 2020 Presidential Election

    Open Access•David E Campbell, James R G Kirk et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Aaron C Weinschenk, Christopher T Dawes•The Forum•2019

  • A cultural theory and model of power relations

    Maroussia Favre, Brendon Swedlow et al.•Journal of Political Power•2019

  • Riled up about running for office

    Jamie S Scott, Jonathan E Collins•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • Nobody's free until everybody's free

    M Brielle Harbin, Michele F Margolis•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • Supporters and opponents of Donald Trump respond differently to racial cues

    Open Access•Matthew D Luttig, Celso Federico et al.•Research & Politics•2017

  • Authoritarianism and support for Trump and Clinton in the 2016 primaries

    Open Access•Trent Ollerenshaw•Research & Politics•2023

  • Trump against Germany

    Open Access•Christian Von Sikorski•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Fear of terrorism and its correlates in young men and women from the United States and South Korea

    Open Access•Fang Hong, Yijing Lin et al.•Journal of Aggression Conflict…•2020

  • Donald Trump's discursive field

    Open Access•Eric O Silva•Sociology Compass•2019

  • Trumping the equality norm? Presidential tweets and revealed racial attitudes

    Open Access•Nicolas M Anspach•New Media & Society•2020

  • Authoritarian citizens and democratic models

    Open Access•Patricia Rehus•Democratization•2026

  • The Authoritarian Predisposition and American Public Support for Social Security

    Open Access•David Macdonald•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • The power of Trump-speak

    Open Access•Alexandra Homolar, Ronny Scholz•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • Authoritarianism and support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election

    Open Access•Jonathan Knuckey, Komysha Hassan•The Social Science Journal•2019

  • Authoritarian Attitudes and Public Service Motivation

    Open Access•Colt Jensen, Jaclyn Piatak•The American Review of Public…•2026

  • The party-on-the-Net

    Open Access•Alejandro M Peña, Tomás Gold•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Appealing to the base or to the moveable middle? Incumbents’ partisan messaging before the 2016 U.S. congressional elections

    Libby Hemphill, Matthew A Shapiro•Journal of Information Technology…•2019

  • Making America Exceptional Again

    Open Access•Flavio Rogerio Hickel, A R Murphy•Politics and Religion•2021

  • Back to a White Future

    Darrius D Hills, Darrius Hills•Black Theology•2018

  • Collective Memory, Democratic Ambivalence, and Authoritarian Notions of Democracy

    Open Access•Burhanuddin Muhtadi•Journal of Current Southeast…•2025

  • All by Himself? Trump, Isolationism, and the American Electorate

    Kyle Dodson, Clem­brook et al.•Sociological Quarterly•2022

  • Moral Values and Voting

    Benjamin Enke•Journal of Political Economy•2020

  • Confidence in Merit-Based Public Administration in the Context of Right-Wing Authoritarian Populism

    Open Access•Christopher A Simon, Michael C Moltz•Administration & Society•2022

  • Testing the Measurement Invariance of Nativism

    Open Access•Yikai Zhao•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Presidential Elections, Divided Politics, and Happiness in the USA

    Open Access•Sergio Pinto, Panka Bencsik et al.•Economica•2021

  • Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign

    Josephine Lukito•Political Communication•2019

  • Putting US First

    Open Access•Wayde Z C Marsh•American Politics Research•2021

  • Authoritarian Personality and Gender Differences in Gun Control Attitudes

    Mary-Kate Lizotte•Women & Politics•2019

  • Populist Psychology

    Matthew Rhodes-Purdy, Rachel Navarre et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Reconsidering the Relationship between Authoritarianism and Republican Support in 2016 and Beyond

    Matthew D Luttig•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Will AmericansReallyVote for a Woman President? Aggregate Gender Bias in the 2016 Presidential Election

    Nicholas Pyeatt, Alixandra B Yanus•Representation•2020

  • Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote

    Christopher M Federico, Celso Federico et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Executive policymaking influence via the administrative apparatus

    Open Access•Susan Webb Yackee•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Introduction to the special issue

    Open Access•Corina Lacatus, Gustav Meibauer•Politics•2021

  • What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions

    Open Access•Carlo Knotz, Alyssa M Taylor et al.•Political Studies•2025

  • Debating the Populist Pariah

    Open Access•Esther Mary L Calvo, Hanna Bäck et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • The Effect of Group Polarization on Opposition to Donald Trump

    Open Access•Marija A Bekafigo, Marija Bekafigo et al.•Political Psychology•2019

  • Candidate Evaluations Through the Lens of Adaptive Followership Psychology

    Open Access•Lasse Laustsen•Political Psychology•2021

  • Allies or Agitators? How Partisan Identity Shapes Public Opinion about Violent or Nonviolent Protests

    Y Hsiao, Scott Radnitz•Political Communication•2021

  • Authoritarianism, Political Attitudes, and Vote Choice

    Open Access•Pavlos Vasilopoulos, Justin Robinson•Political Behavior•2025

  • The Electoral Costs and Benefits of Feminism in Contemporary American Politics

    Open Access•Marzia Oceno, Nicholas A Valentino et al.•Political Behavior•2023

  • Autocracies win the minds of the democratic public

    Open Access•T Kobayashi, Yuan Zhou et al.•Democratization•2025

  • Did Brazilians Vote for Jair Bolsonaro Because They Share his Most Controversial Views

    Open Access•Mark Setzler•Brazilian Political Science Review•2021

  • On Modeling the Social-Psychological Foundations of Support for Donald Trump

    Open Access•A M Enders, Joseph E Uscinski•American Politics Research•2021

  • The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew Motta•American Politics Research•2018

  • Tell Us How You Feel

    Open Access•Zachary A Scott, Jared Mcdonald•American Politics Research•2022

  • The Party Reacts

    Open Access•Zachary Albert, David J Barney•American Politics Research•2019

  • The Silver Screen and Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Jeffrey M Glas, J Benjamin Taylor•American Politics Research•2018

  • Right-wing populism with Chinese characteristics? Identity, otherness and global imaginaries in debating world politics online

    Open Access•Chenchen Zhang•European Journal of International…•2020

  • The Last Democratic Election

    Open Access•Albert L Samuels, Albert Samuels•Social Sciences•2024

  • Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment

    Open Access•B Bonikowski•British Journal of Sociology•2017

  • The Authoritarian Personality and the Limits of American Social Science

    Michael Stein, Michael Ashley Stein•South Atlantic Quarterly•2018

  • Pathways to trump

    Open Access•Patrick D Tucker, Patrick Tucker et al.•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Social media, fear, and support for state surveillance

    Open Access•Yu Zeng, Stan Hok-Wui Wong•China Information•2023

  • Environmental Deregulation, Spectacular Racism, and White Nationalism in the Trump Era

    Lucila Pulido, Laura Pulido et al.•Annals of the American…•2019

  • Albion's seed

    David Hackett Fischer•Albion's seed•1989

  • The Party Decides

    Marty Cohen, David Karol et al.•Party Decides•2008

  • The Authoritarian Dynamic

    Open Access•Karen Stenner•Authoritarian Dynamic•2005

  • Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Stanley Feldman, Karen Stenner•Political Psychology•1997

  • Authoritarianism and Group Identification

    John Duckitt•Political Psychology•1989

  • Enforcing Social Conformity

    Open Access•Stanley Feldman•Political Psychology•2003

  • Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information

    Open Access•Howard Lavine, Milton Lodge et al.•Political Psychology•2005

  • Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington, Marc Hetherington et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism

    Seymour Martin Lipset•American Sociological Review•1959

  • Political conservatism as motivated social cognition

    John T Jost, Jack Glaser et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution

    Open Access•E G Carmines, James A Stimson•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works93
Citations per year10,33
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 69

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae