Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Presidential Elections, Divided Politics, and Happiness in the USA

Bibliographic Data

ID9724159
AuthorsSergio Pinto (0000-0002-6910-0128, University of Maryland and Instituto Universitário de Lisboa), Panka Bencsik (University of Chicago), Tuugi Chuluun (Loyola University Maryland, corresponding author), C Graham (0000-0001-6088-1960, Brookings Institution)
Year2021
Volume88
Issue349
Pages189-207
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ecca.12349
OpenAlexW2921533027
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited40

We examine the effects of the 2016 and 2012 US presidential election outcomes on subjective wellbeing across party identification. We use Gallup data and a regression discontinuity approach, and focus primarily on evaluative (life satisfaction) and hedonic (positive and negative affect) indicators. We find that both elections had strong negative wellbeing effects on those who identified with the losing party, with little or no increase in wellbeing for those identifying with the winning party. The negative effects for the losing side were larger in 2016 than in 2012, by a factor of three on some indicators, and were driven mainly by women and middle‐income households. As such, both elections had a net negative wellbeing effect, but more so in 2016. Local voting patterns did not have a substantial wellbeing impact, nor did congressional elections taking place the same day. In 2016, the election also changed respondents’ perceptions about the economy, their financial status, and their community. After both elections, hedonic wellbeing gaps across parties typically dissipated within two weeks, but there was more persistence in evaluative wellbeing gaps, especially in expected life satisfaction. The latter gap persisted throughout 2017

Affect (linguistics) · Demographic economics · Economics · Happiness · Life satisfaction · Perception · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Regression discontinuity design · Subjective well-being · Voting · Health disparities and outcomes · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Trajectories of Psychological Outcomes During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

    Open Access•Olga Stavrova, Dong Ren et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • Social capital, education, and subjective well-being in Ecuador

    Open Access•Aracelly Núñez-Naranjo, Ximena Morales-Urrutia et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2024

  • Worldview defence and self‐determination theory explain the return of racial voting

    Open Access•Mark Fabian, Robert Breunig et al.•European Journal of Social…•2023

  • Do emotions drive the link between winning and satisfaction with democracy? Leveraging the Super Bowl, the World Cup, and The Lion King

    Open Access•Swaran P Singh, Patrick Fournier et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • Partisanship and Mental Health

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lyons, Ellen J Schafer et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Does the Election Winner–Loser Gap Extend to Subjective Health and Well-Being

    Open Access•Dimiter Toshkov, Honorata Mazepus•Political Studies Review•2023

  • State government control and partisan happiness

    Open Access•P Flavin•Party Politics•2024

  • When Public Health Crises Become Entwined

    Open Access•Emily Dobson, C Graham et al.•The Annals of the American…•2021

  • Family Violence and Football

    David Card, Gordon B Dahl•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2011

  • Rdrobust

    Open Access•Sebastian Calonico, Matias D Cattaneo et al.•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2017

  • Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even

    Open Access•Richard H Thaler, E Johnson et al.•Management Science•1990

  • Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?

    Open Access•Jaime L Napier, John T Jost•Psychological Science•2008

  • Life Satisfaction and Political Participation

    Open Access•P Flavin, Michael Keane et al.•Journal of Happiness Studies•2012

  • Police killings and their spillover effects on the mental health of black Americans

    Open Access•Joep Bor, Jacob Bor et al.•The Lancet•2018

  • High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Angus Deaton•Proceedings of the National…•2010

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics

    David S Lee, Thomas Lemieux•Journal of Economic Literature•2010

  • The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support

    Open Access•Eric D Knowles, Linda R Tropp•Social Psychological and…•2018

  • Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016

    Open Access•Heather C Lench, Linda J Levine et al.•Emotion•2018

  • Losing Hurts

    Open Access•Lois Pierce, Todd Rogers et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2015

  • The Challenges of Untangling the Relationship Between Participation and Happiness

    Open Access•Matthew S Winters, Ashlea Rundlett•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2014

  • More than a rural revolt

    Open Access•M Monnat, David L Brown•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • For the Win! The Effect of Professional Sports Records on Mayoral Elections

    Open Access•Michael K Miller•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Who Got the Brexit Blues? The Effect of Brexit on Subjective Wellbeing in the UK

    Open Access•Nattavudh Powdthavee, Anke C Plagnol et al.•Economica•2019

  • Destruction and Distress

    Open Access•Robert Metcalfe, Nattavudh Powdthavee et al.•The Economic Journal•2011

  • Happiness, Economy and Institutions

    Open Access•Bruno S Frey, Alois Stutzer•The Economic Journal•2000

  • Do Birds of a Feather Vote Together, or Is It Peer Influence

    Open Access•Stefan Wojcik•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Affective Forecasting Errors in the 2008 Election

    Open Access•Catherine J Norris, Amanda G Dumville et al.•Political Psychology•2011

  • Immune neglect

    Daniel T Gilbert, Elizabeth C Pinel et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump

    Open Access•Matthew C Macwilliams•PS Political Science & Politics•2016

  • Swing voting in the 2016 presidential election in counties where midlife mortality has been rising in white non-Hispanic Americans

    Open Access•Usama Bilal, Emily A Knapp et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • Voting and Peer Effects

    Marcel Fafchamps, Ana Vaz et al.•Economic Development and Cultural…•2020

  • Angry, Passionate, and Divided

    Open Access•Dan Schill, Rita Kirk•American Behavioral Scientist•2017

  • The Link Between Voting and Life Satisfaction in Latin America

    Open Access•Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca Weitz‐shapiro et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2011

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae