Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science

Bibliographic Data

ID6103409
AuthorsJohn R Zaller, John Zaller (University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume31
Issue2
Pages182-189
Publication date1998-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/420248
OpenAlexW2107629008
LanguageEN
Citations received92
References cited12

The bounce in President Clinton's job ratings that occurred in the initial 10 days of the Lewinsky imbroglio may offer as much insight into the dynamics of public opinion as any single event in recent memory. What it shows is not just the power of a booming economy to buttress presidential popularity. It shows, more generally, the importance of political substance, as against media hype, in American politics. Even when, as occurred in this case, public opinion is initially responsive to media reports of scandal, the public's concern with actual political achievement reasserts itself. This lesson, which was not nearly so clear before the Lewinsky matter as it is now, not only deepens our understanding of American politics. It also tends, as I argue in the second half of this article, to undermine the importance of one large branch of public opinion research, buttress the importance of another, and point toward some new research questions. Whatever else may have transpired by the time this article gets into print, the Lewinsky poll bounce is something worth pondering. In a half-dozen commercial polls taken in the period just before the story broke, Clinton's job approval rating averaged about 60%. Ten days later, following intensive coverage of the story and Clinton's State of the Union address, presidential support was about 10 percentage points higher

Aesthetics · Art · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Presidential system · Public opinion · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Political Science Research and Education

  • Public issues or issue publics? The distribution of genuine political attitudes

    Open Access•Yannick Dufresne, Catherine Ouellet•Behavioural Public Policy•2018

  • Corruption and Political Support

    Open Access•Oscar Castorena, Noam Lupu et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2023

  • The Greater Effects of Sexual Harassment

    Open Access•Tzu‐ping Liu, C Algara•Sexuality Research and Social…•2024

  • Collision with Collusion

    Open Access•Joshua P Darr, Nathan P Kalmoe et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • How to Stay Popular

    Open Access•Courtney Blackington, Frances Cayton•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Uninformed Voters and Corrupt Politicians

    Open Access•Marko Klašnja•American Politics Research•2017

  • Job Approval and Favorability

    Spiro Kiousi•Mass Communication & Society•2003

  • Honesty above all else? Expectations and perceptions of political conduct in three established democracies

    Open Access•Nancy Allen, Nicholas Allen et al.•Comparative European Politics•2016

  • Killing the Messenger

    Spiro Kiousi•Journalism Studies•2002

  • Sex, Lies, and Videotape

    Open Access•P Norris•Harvard International Journal of…•1999

  • FDR to Clinton, Mueller to

    Open Access•Paul Gronke, Brian Newman et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Life Is Not Fair

    Susan B Hansen•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Bill Clinton's Approval Ratings

    Brian Newman•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Stonewalling and Suspicion during Presidential Scandals

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • A Return to Civic and Political Engagement Prompted by Personalized Political Leadership

    Gilberto Mazzoleni, Gianpietro Mazzoleni•Political Communication•2000

  • Civic Engagement in the Era of Big Stories

    Regina G Lawrence, W L Bennett•Political Communication•2000

  • The UnCivic Culture

    Open Access•W L Bennett•PS Political Science & Politics•1998

  • Forgiving and Forgetting

    Open Access•Molly W Sonner, Clyde Wilcox•PS Political Science & Politics•1999

  • Ithiel De Sola Pool Lecture

    W L Bennett•PS Political Science & Politics•1998

  • Clinton's Impeachment Will Have Few Consequences for the Presidency

    Open Access•Robert J Spitzer•PS Political Science & Politics•1999

  • Political Scandal in American Politics

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Surviving Scandal

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Sex, Politics, and Public Opinion

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller•PS Political Science & Politics•1999

  • Tuning in to Scandal

    Open Access•Michael K Romano, Michael Romano•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Presidential Vote Models

    Larry M Bartels, John Zaller•PS Political Science & Politics•2001

  • Toward genuine self-government

    Open Access•Wilson Carey Mcwilliams•Academic Questions•2001

  • Presidential Impeachment and Institutional Dynamics in the Iran-Contra Affair and the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal

    Amy Fried, Timothy M Cole•Congress & the Presidency•2004

  • Modeling the rally event in presidential politics

    Open Access•Joshua Behr, Joshua G Behr•The Social Science Journal•2006

  • Outrageous political opinion and political anxiety in the US

    Open Access•Sarah Sobieraj, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•Poetics•2013

  • May the weak force be with you

    Open Access•Kenneth Newton•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • Medios de comunicación como intermediarios del voto

    Open Access•Javier Alcalde Villacampa, Javier Alcalde•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2003

  • Moderators of Priming Effects

    Open Access•Lionel Marquis•International Political Science…•2007

  • The impact of political scandals on political support

    Open Access•J Maier•International Political Science…•2011

  • Cushioning the Fall

    Open Access•Ryan E Carlin, Gregory J Love et al.•Political Behavior•2015

  • Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval

    Open Access•Ellen M Key, Kathleen Donovan et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Partisanship, Information, and the Conditional Effects of Scandal on Voting Decisions

    Open Access•Amy S Funck, K T Mccabe•Political Behavior•2022

  • Testing Zaller’s Reception and Acceptance Model in an Intense Election Campaign

    Open Access•Agnieszka Dobrzynska, André Blais•Political Behavior•2008

  • Leadership Image‐Building

    Open Access•Marion R Just, Marion Just et al.•Political Psychology•2000

  • Popular Politics and the Clinton/Lewinsky Affair

    Open Access•Diana Owens, Diana Owen•Political Psychology•2000

  • The Effects of Scandalous Information on Recall of Policy-Related Information

    Open Access•Beth Miller•Political Psychology•2010

  • Mass Response to the Lewinsky Scandal

    Open Access•Mark Fischle•Political Psychology•2000

  • Taxation and presidential approval

    Open Access•Benny Geys, Jan Vermeir•Public Choice•2008

  • Evidence on the importance of spatial voting models in presidential nominations and elections

    Open Access•Lawrence W Kenny, Babak Lotfinia•Public Choice•2005

  • Democracia y ciudadanía en el tiempo de los medios audiovisuales

    Open Access•Ludolfo Paramio•Desarrollo Económico•2002

  • Liberal Elites, Socialist Masses, and Problems of Russian Democracy

    Open Access•Judith Kullberg, Judith S Kullberg et al.•World Politics•1999

  • Surviving Scandal

    Open Access•Greg Vonnahme, Beth Miller Vonnahme•Social Science Quarterly•2014

  • How Trust Attitudes Promote Grassroots Lobbying in the American States

    Open Access•John Cluverius, Kevin K Banda•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Short-Term Communication Effects or Longstanding Dispositions? The Public’s Response to the Financial Crisis of 2008

    N Malhotra, Yotam Margalit•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Party Responsiveness to the Collective Judgment of the Electorate

    Open Access•Seonghui Lee•Comparative Political Studies•2014

  • Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers

    Open Access•Ryan D Enos, E Hersh et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • In Praise of Skepticism

    P Norris•In Praise of Skepticism•2022

  • The Institutional Effects of Executive Scandals

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus•Institutional Effects of…•2015

  • The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics

    Open Access•Richard Johnston, Michael G Hagen et al.•2000 Presidential Election and…•2004

  • Cynical and Engaged

    Open Access•Claes H De Vreese, Holli A Semetko•Communication Research•2002

  • Congress, Presidential Approval, and U.S. Dispute Initiation

    Open Access•David J Brulé, David Brulé•Foreign Policy Analysis•2008

  • Policy Feedback and Public Opinion

    Michael K Gusmano, Mark Schlesinger et al.•Journal of Health Politics Policy…•2002

  • Slavophiles and Westernizers Redux

    William Zimmerman•Post-Soviet Affairs•2005

  • Normative regulations and the use of language in describing political events

    Open Access•José Francisco Hinestroza Valencia, José Francisco Valencia et al.•Quaderns de Psicologia•2011

  • Politics without Citizens? Public Opinion, Television News, the President, and Real-World Factors in Chile, 2000-2005

    Open Access•Sebastián Valenzuela, Agustín Arriagada•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Revisiting the Character of Congress

    Lara M Brown•Journal of Political Marketing•2006

  • Political Evaluations and Spousal Responses to Candidate Infidelity

    J Gainous, Alyson Hendricks-Benton et al.•Journal of Political Marketing•2025

  • Public Opinion and the Impeachment of Bill Clinton

    Gary C Jacobson•Journal of Elections Public…•2000

  • Of suspicious minds

    Nyron N Crawford•Journal of Urban Affairs•2018

  • The Role of Issues in the 2000 U. S. Presidential Election

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller, Thomas F Klobucar•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2003

  • The Resilience of Separation of Powers? Congress and the Russia Investigation

    Open Access•Douglas L Kriner, Douglas Kriner et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Substance versus Style

    Open Access•Gregory E Mcavoy•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Why Did Clinton Survive the Impeachment Crisis? A Test of Three Explanations

    Open Access•Carol L Silva, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Scandal, Elites, and Presidential Popularity

    Open Access•Matthew Woessner, Matthew C Woessner•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Opportunism in Polarization

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann, Vimal Kumar•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Are they working for us? A geographic comparison of United States government performance evaluations in presidential elections, 2006–2020

    Open Access•Chelsea N Kaufman•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Blame Avoidance in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Christopher Hood, Will Jennings et al.•Public Administration•2015

  • Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Douglas A Hibbs•Public Choice•2000

  • Beyond polarization and priming

    Open Access•Patrick Meirick, Jill A Edy•Social Science Quarterly•2022

  • Electoral campaign effects

    Open Access•Hanspeter Kriesi, Abel Bojar et al.•Party Politics•2026

  • Recasting the Meaning of Elections

    Tristan Klingelhöfer•Comparative Politics•2026

  • Congressional Response to Mandate Elections

    Open Access•Drexel A Peterson, David A M Peterson et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • No Sex Scandals Please, We’re French

    Katja Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, Nancy Allen et al.•West European Politics•2014

  • Political Deepfakes Are as Credible as Other Fake Media and (Sometimes) Real Media

    Soubhik Barari, C Lucas et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Sexual Predators in Contest for Public Office

    Open Access•Stephanie Stark, Sofia Collignon•Political Studies Review•2022

  • On the Knowledge of Politics and the Politics of Knowledge

    Open Access•Guy Elcheroth, Willem Doise et al.•Political Psychology•2011

  • "Mediatization" of Politics

    Gilberto Mazzoleni, Gianpietro Mazzoleni et al.•Political Communication•1999

  • Social alienation and cultural distance in the context of secession in the South Caucasus

    Open Access•Valery Dzutsati•Nations and Nationalism•2021

  • The Psychological Veracity of Zaller's Model

    Cindy D Kam•Critical Review•2012

  • Public opinion, elites, and democracy

    Robert Y Shapiro•Critical Review•1998

  • The Political Education of John Zaller

    Larry M Bartels•Critical Review•2012

  • Limits of Elite Influence on Public Opinion

    Stanley Feldman, Leonie Huddy et al.•Critical Review•2012

  • Should the Mass Public Follow Elite Opinion? It Depends

    Jennifer Hochschild, Jennifer L Hochschild•Critical Review•2012

  • The Varying Political Toll of Concerns About Corruption in Good Versus Bad Economic Times

    Open Access•Elizabeth J Zechmeister, Daniel Zizumbo-Colunga•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • How Citizens React to Political Scandals Surrounding Government Leaders

    Francis L F Lee, Francis Lee•Asian Journal of Political Science•2015

  • Thenewsmedia Aspoliticalinstitutions

    M Schudson•Annual Review of Political Science•2002

  • Political Scandal

    Open Access•Wioletta Dziuda, William G Howell•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Scandal-ridden campaigns

    Steven P Nawara, Mandi Bates Bailey•The Social Science Journal•2025

  • The symbolic uses of politics

    Murray J Edelman•The symbolic uses of politics•1964

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • The Responsible Electorate

    V O Key, Arthur Maass et al.•Responsible Electorate•1966

  • Forecasting Presidential Elections

    Steven J Rosenstone•Forecasting Presidential Elections•1983

  • Constructing the political spectacle

    Murray J Edelman•Constructing the political…•1988

  • The Responsible Electorate

    Open Access•Philip E Converse•Political Science Quarterly•1966

  • War, Presidents and Public Opinion

    D K Adams•International Affairs•1975

  • Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

    Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Assessing the President

    Richard A Brody•Assessing the President•1991

  • Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964

    Open Access•Gerald H Kramer•American Political Science Review•1971

  • A Model of the Political Economy of the United States

    Open Access•Alberto Alesina, John Londregan et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

Unique citing works92
Citations per year3,29
Citation span1998 - 2026 (29)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 42

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae