Use of data envelopment analysis for efficiency evaluation of czech hospitals
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6109304 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Dlouhý (0000-0003-1028-1822), Josef Jablonský (0000-0003-0606-354X), Ivana Novosádová |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 60-71 |
| Publication date | 2007-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politická ekonomie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3233 • E-ISSN: 2336-8225 |
| Publisher | Prague University of Economics and Business (PUBLISHER • CZ) |
| DOI | 10.18267/j.polek.590 |
| OpenAlex | W2328282259 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Efficiency of hospitals belongs among frequently discussed topics of public policy. This paper deals with a nonparametric model for efficiency evaluation of hospitals - data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA evaluates efficiency of production units with the help of mathematical programming. DEA specifies the production frontier as the most pessimistic piecewise linear envelopment of the data. In case that a hospital is inefficient DEA determines the sources of inefficiency and defines corresponding target values. In this study, authors analyze the sample of 22 Czech acute-care hospitals with the constant-returns-to-scale model (the CCR model) and the variable-returns-to-scale model (the BCC model). The data comes from regional yearbooks of the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (Ă ZIS Ä R). A fundamental problem of evaluation in health care is a definition of inputs and outputs, especially a measurement of case-mix of patients. Interpretation of the results is described on one selected hospital (Hospital of Prachatice). One hospital was identified as efficient by the CCR model and six hospitals were efficient according to the BCC model
Business · Czech · Data envelopment analysis · Econometrics · Economics · Operations research · Statistics · Computer Science · Engineering · Global Health Care Issues · Mathematics
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |