The Prophetic Reason for Religious and Cultural Understanding
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6126844 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Manuel Losada-Sierra (0000-0002-3681-8475), John Mandalios |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 13-22 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Civic Political and Community Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2327-0047 • E-ISSN: 2327-2155 |
| Publisher | Common Ground Research Networks (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.18848/2327-0047/cgp/v11i02/43549 |
| OpenAlex | W1515375742 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
Interreligious and intercultural dialogue is supposed to be the best way to solve the conflicts arising from rival religious hermeneutics and different modes to conceive the ideal of a good life in contemporary multicultural and pluralistic societies. In regard to communicative or dialogical reason, respectful coexistence can be reached only by argumentative communication between interested people. In this sense, only rational arguments, strong enough to pass the test of the shared rationality can be valid at a discursive level. However, Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas and Catholic theologian Johann Baptist Metz challenge symmetrical and rational-based dialogue in order to postulate an asymmetrical relationship by giving voice to the other. For them, the core of interreligious and intercultural engagement does not start from rational agreements as Habermas, for instance, has proposed; but from prophetic and anamnestic reasons. This analytical and comparative presentation will show the possibilities of anamnestic reason and religion as service against dialogical reason in intercultural and interreligious contexts. Levinas's and Metz's criticism of dialogical reason opens new perspectives which contribute to reflection for both political theology and political philosophy.
Aesthetics · Sociology · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |