Worlds Not Yet in Being

Reconciling Anthropology and Utopianism

Bibliographic Data

ID6136162
AuthorsMartin Hébert (0000-0002-3467-5853, Berlin University of the Arts, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume3
Issue3
Publication date2016-08-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropology & Materialism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2364-0480 • E-ISSN: 2364-0480
PublisherOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/am.604
OpenAlexW2564416640
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited41

In this article, I discuss potential contributions of the concepts of utopia and utopianism to contemporary anthropological theory. Taking Indigenous politics in the state of Chiapas, Mexico, as an empirical backdrop, our exploration begins by situating the meaning of these concepts by examining some aspects of utopian theory as it has developed outside anthropology. In particular, I look at how Karl Mannheim understood the notion of utopia in the 1920s, arguing that his juxtaposition of utopia and ideology can be productive for political anthropology. After addressing some of the reasons why anthropological theory has been reluctant to incorporate the concept of utopia, a reluctance often related to the concept’s modernist and Western connotations, I argue that utopia should be understood as a transformative impulse rather than a specific content or blueprint that outlines a desired social order. By examining how this utopian impulse manifested itself during the first years of the Zapatista movement on various levels from the community to the global civil society, I content that the concept of utopia can make at least two contributions to today’s anthropological theory. First, it can help analysing broad movements that mobilise a wide variety of actors. I look at examples from Chiapas and conclude that the Zapatistas’ call for the creation of an “International of Hope”, articulating diverse “life projects” into a larger, anti-hegemonic political project, can be interpreted in a productive way through the lens of utopianism. The concept’s second contribution to comparative anthropological work goes back to Mannheim’s idea that utopias are “situationally transcendent” ideas and practices. While anthropology actively studies encounters between different worlds within the confines of a given social-historical situation, it is less attentive to possibilities and worlds “not yet in being”. In closing, I argue that a deeper consideration of utopianism within the context of anthropological debates can make a significant contribution to moving critical anthropology’s focus from the suffering subject to the hoping subject, a project that scholars and activists have long demanded

Aesthetics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Hegemony · Ideology · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Utopia · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access