Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Whose Sidewalk

Tactically Negotiating the Boundary between Public and Private Space in Limassol

Bibliographic Data

ID6136190
AuthorsTheodoros Kouros (0000-0003-2742-1158, University of Cyprus, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume37
Issue1
Publication date2021-11-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Anthropology of East Europe Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1054-4720 • E-ISSN: 2153-2931
PublisherIUScholarWorks (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14434/aeer.v37i1.32020
OpenAlexW3213080538
LanguageEN
References cited14

Home is a nodal point in a series of polarities, including family-community; space-place; inside-outside; private-public; domestic-social. These may not be stable but seem both solidified and undermined as they play out their meaning and practice in and through the home. The “public” is traditionally the state’s domain, while the “private” the citizens’. But where does “private” end and “public” begin? Can a border or boundary be placed between the two? Is such a boundary culture-specific or universal? Is it static or dynamic? Scholars often perceive borders as barriers and bridges, porous and impenetrable, and border studies have shown that urban entities have their own internal and external borders. I argue that such internal urban micro-boundaries can be found in the domain of domestic space, separating the private from the public, and that they are dynamic and constantly negotiated. Not necessarily marked, they are acknowledged by a mutual and tacit agreement, a social and cultural consensus. In this paper, I focus on common expansions of private into public space in Limassol, Cyprus, and the ways in which, this social consensus is achieved through the use of several tactics. As I illustrate, all these tactics seem to transform public space into private, on a symbolic level. The paper’s contribution lies in the examination of this type of boundary, which has received little academic attention, as well as in the introduction of the term “tactics of inhibition

Boundary (topology · Epistemology · Geography · Geometry · Meaning (existential · Point (geometry · Political science · Private space · Public domain · Public relations · Public space · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Class, codes and control

    Basil Bernstein•Class, codes and control•1971

  • Domesticating revolution

    Gerald W Creed•Domesticating revolution•1998

  • Social Research

    Piergiorgio Corbetta•Social Research•2003

  • Nation, state and identity at international borders

    Open Access•Thomas Wilson, Thomas M Wilson et al.•Border Identities•1998

  • The Social Production of Indifference

    M Herzfeld•Social Production of Indifference•2021

  • Home

    J Macgregor Wise•Cultural Studies•2000

  • Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs

    Michael Lipsky•Social Service Review•1984

  • Human Territoriality

    Robert David Sack•Politics•2017

  • Social Capital in Britain

    Open Access•Peter A Hall•British Journal of Political…•1999

  • A Truant Proximity

    Open Access•R Shields•Environment and Planning D…•1992

  • Disengagement and Desire

    Open Access•Lisette Josephides•American Ethnologist•1999

  • Tradition and Modernity in the Mediterranean

    Open Access•James D Faubion•American Anthropologist•1997

  • Introduction Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Anya Bernstein, Elizabeth Mertz•PoLAR Political and Legal…•2011

  • On De-Pathologizing Resistance

    D Theodossopoulos•History and Anthropology•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae