Es sostenible el constructivismo radical
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6140906 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alfredo Gaete (0000-0002-1274-5638, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Issue | 46 |
| Pages | 1-8 |
| Publication date | 2013-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cinta de moebio (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0717-554X • E-ISSN: 0717-554X |
| Publisher | SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4067/s0717-554x2013000100001 |
| OpenAlex | W2001466850 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0717-554X2013000100001 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
In this work I try to show that radical, epistemological constructivism is an untenable thesis.Not so much because the arguments in favor of such a thesis are deficient, but because there are crucial problems that no constructivist seems to have solved and that must be solved in order for it to be possible to even formulate the thesis in question.I also mention a consequence that these considerations have in education
Constructivism (international relations · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Educational Practices and Policies · Educational theories and practices · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,15 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2022 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |