Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social Media in Conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID6141543
AuthorsChris Hables Gray (0000-0003-2247-228X), Ángel Gordo (0000-0003-4493-2910, Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Year2014
Volume10
Issue3
Pages251-261
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCultural Politics an International Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1743-2197 • E-ISSN: 1751-7435
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/17432197-2795645
OpenAlexW2135547221
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited4

There are important differences in how information technology is used in military and social-movement cultures. Militaries use social media in the Human Terrain model and security-police mode for quantifying and controlling social space, in order to meet low-intensity, counterinsurgency, and regime-maintenance goals (or for recruitment and public relations). For social-movement cultures, such as secular Egyptian revolutionaries, 15M (Los Indignados), and Idle No More, social media is an integral part of life; it is context. Unlike these horizontalist movements, military institutions are based on a hierarchical structure that precludes social media from becoming part of their organizational and decision-making culture. For them, social media constitute part of civil society, a commons both virtual and physical. The synergy between computer networks and decentralized social movements is clear when military, social-movement, and network theories and practices are compared. These differences are manifested in asymmetrical relationships to “veillance,” alternative modes of producing social technologies (especially protocols), contrasting theories of power, and opposing conceptions of morality and efficacy. The differences are more than a matter of how the affordances of information technologies match with the different technocultures. Horizontalist social movements incorporate new information technologies into their praxis as self-control, while militaries seek to subsume them into the existing hierarchical control paradigms

Affordance · Civil society · Cognitive psychology · Commons · Context (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Praxis · Public relations · Resource mobilization · Social media · Social movement · Social order · Sociology · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Drones, War, and Technological Seduction

    Chris Hables Gray•Technology and Culture•2018

  • Iran

    Evgeny Morozov•Dissent•2009

  • [En] Exploring safety and agency in social media

    Open Access•Nerea Boneta, Anita Fuentes•Investigaciones Feministas•2024

  • Canada is #IdleNoMore

    Open Access•Vincent Raynauld, Emmanuelle Richez et al.•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Social media influence, trust, and conflict

    Open Access•Nathan Johnson, Benjamin Turnbull et al.•Technology in Society•2022

  • Social Media Sentiment Analysis

    Jeremy Prichard, Paul Watters et al.•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2015

  • Post- sapiens

    Chris Hables Gray•Journal of Posthuman Studies•2017

  • Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence

    Open Access•Steve Woolgar, Geoff Cooper•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • Networks of Power

    Thomas Hughes, Thomas Park Hughes et al.•Networks of power•1993

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,3
Citation span1999 - 2024 (26)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae