La Chine peut-elle penser l’universel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6142432 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne Cheng (Collège de France, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 50 |
| Pages | 219-226 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ebisu (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1340-3656 • E-ISSN: 2189-1893 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/ebisu.1219 |
| OpenAlex | W337181805 |
| Language | FR |
The advent of universality is generally thought to be the product of European Enlightenment philosophy and the “triumph of Reason”, yet Chinese universality is tied to a certain idea of civilisation – organised around a centre radiating outwards – onto which the reality of imperial authority was superimposed.The geographic transposition of this outward-radiating power was the “Sinicised world” encompassing a large part of East Asia. Imperial China’s self-representation as “civilisation-world” was only challenged in the nineteenth century by the intrusion of the colonial powers, as well as Japanese modernist criticism. Yet it is this China-as-world universality that is currently making a comeback in the ideology of “Greater China
Art · Humanities · Chinese history and philosophy · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|