Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Administration by algorithm

A risk management framework

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6149416
AutoresFrank Bannister (0000-0003-3673-0374, Trinity College Dublin, autor correspondente), Robert Connolly (0000-0003-3196-2889, Dublin City University), Regina Connolly (Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland)
EditoresSarah Giest (0000-0001-8201-6943), Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen (0000-0002-1553-6065)
Ano2020
Volume25
Fascículo4
Páginas471-490
Data de publicação2020-12-04
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInformation Polity (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255
EditoraIOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.3233/ip-200249
OpenAlexW3112426303
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas32
Referências citadas17

Algorithmic decision-making is neither a recent phenomenon nor one necessarily associated with artificial intelligence (AI), though advances in AI are increasingly resulting in what were heretofore human decisions being taken over by, or becoming dependent on, algorithms and technologies like machine learning. Such developments promise many potential benefits, but are not without certain risks. These risks are not always well understood. It is not just a question of machines making mistakes; it is the embedding of values, biases and prejudices in software which can discriminate against both individuals and groups in society. Such biases are often hard either to detect or prove, particularly where there are problems with transparency and accountability and where such systems are outsourced to the private sector. Consequently, being able to detect and categorise these risks is essential in order to develop a systematic and calibrated response. This paper proposes a simple taxonomy of decision-making algorithms in the public sector and uses this to build a risk management framework with a number of components including an accountability structure and regulatory governance. This framework is designed to assist scholars and practitioners interested in ensuring structured accountability and legal regulation of AI in the public sphere

Accountability · Business · Computer security · Corporate governance · Economics · Management science · Order (exchange · Political science · Private sector · Public sector · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk management · Taxonomy (biology · Transparency (behavior · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance

  • The different roles of algorithms in research on governmental decision-making for citizen services

    Open Access•Karin Hedström•Transforming Government: People,…•2026

  • Prospects and Challenges of Future AI-Enabled Government

    Open Access•M Jae Moon, Sabinne Lee•Public Performance & Management…•2026

  • AI adoption in Thailand's e-government services

    Open Access•Siriporn Thitalampoon, Attama Boonpalit et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Information Polity publishes more than strong empirical studies

    Open Access•F Bannister, R Connolly et al.•Information Polity•2023

  • The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion

    Mohammad Alshallaqi•Public Management Review•2024

  • Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations

    Open Access•Oliver Neumann, Katharina Guirguis et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Algorithmic Transparency and Citizen Trust in Digital Governance

    Open Access•Ye Zheng, Muhammad Farhan•Technology in Society•2026

  • Algorithmic Governance and the Banality of Evil

    Hyungjoon Jun, Hyun Jung Lee•Public Integrity•2026

  • How Should Public Administrations Foster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI

    Open Access•Anton Sigfrids, Mika Nieminen et al.•Frontiers in Human Dynamics•2022

  • Machine Intelligence, Bureaucracy, and Human Control

    Open Access•Justin B Bullock, Hsini Huang et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Legitimacy of Algorithmic Decision-Making

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Albert Meijer et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration

    Open Access•Zbysław Dobrowolski, Grzegorz Drozdowski et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Algorithmic policing accountability

    Martijn Wessels•Policing & Society•2023

  • Policy initiatives for Artificial Intelligence-enabled government

    Open Access•Colin van Noordt, Rony Medaglia et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2023

  • Regulating generative AI

    Open Access•Antonio Cordella, Francesco Gualdi•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Creating a workforce of fatigued cynics? A randomized controlled trial of implementing an algorithmic decision-making support tool

    Open Access•Matthias Döring, Kim Sass Mikkelsen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Public value positions and design preferences toward AI-based chatbots in e-government. Evidence from a conjoint experiment with citizens and municipal front desk officers

    Open Access•Sebastian Hemesath, Melissa Tepe•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • A matter of perspective

    Open Access•Bettina Distel, Ida Lindgren•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Structuring the scattered literature on algorithmic profiling in the case of unemployment through a systematic literature review

    Open Access•Kristian Bisgaard Haug•International Journal of…•2022

  • Just like I thought’

    Open Access•Friso Selten, Marcel Robeer et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • How Do Algorithmic Decision‐Making Systems Used in Public Benefits Determinations Fail? Insights From Legal Challenges

    Open Access•Esra Gules‐Guctas•Public Administration Review•2025

  • AI, Bureaucracy, and Institutional Ethics

    Daniel Baracskay, Michael Blair Thomas•Public Integrity•2026

  • Research on digital discretion-The subjectification of street-level work in public administration

    Open Access•Jörgen Johansson•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • Citizens’ trust in AI-enabled government systems

    Yi-Fan Wang, Yu‐che Chen et al.•Information Polity•2024

  • Screen-level bureaucrats in the age of algorithms

    Carlos Soares, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen et al.•Information Polity•2023

  • Citizens’ attitudes towards automated decision-making

    Open Access•Thomas Denk, Karin Hedström et al.•Information Polity•2022

  • Introduction to special issue algorithmic transparency in government

    Sarah Giest, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Information Polity•2020

  • How professionals respond to the disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction

    Open Access•Qin Chen, Qisi Chen et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Evolving AI policy and the public administrator

    Michael Blair Thomas, Daniel Baracskay•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2025

  • Automated, administrative decision‐making and good governance

    Open Access•Ulrik Roehl, Morten Balle Hansen•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Bringing all clients into the system – Professional digital discretion to enhance inclusion when services are automated

    Iréne Bernhard, Elin Wihlborg•Information Polity•2021

  • A critical analysis of the study of gender and technology in government

    Megan Feeney, Mary K Feeney et al.•Information Polity•2021

  • Constructing a Data‐Driven Society

    Open Access•Fan Liang, Vishnupriya Das et al.•Policy & Internet•2018

  • Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey

    Open Access•Eirini Ntoutsi, Pavlos Fafalios et al.•WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge…•2020

  • The second wave of digital-era governance

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2013

  • The Trouble with Transparency

    Open Access•Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Policy & Internet•2011

  • AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society

    Open Access•Luciano Floridi, Josh Cowls et al.•Minds and Machines•2018

  • Opening the government’s black boxes

    Katherine Fink•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes

    Open Access•Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2018

  • Seeing without knowing

    Open Access•Mike Ananny, K Crawford•New Media & Society•2016

  • Illusions of Accountability

    Jonathan Anderson•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2009

  • Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust

    Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen•Information Polity•2009

  • Knowing public services

    Open Access•Bonny Williamson, Ben Williamson•Public Policy and Administration•2014

Obras citantes distintas32
Citações por ano5,33
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 32
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae