Administration by algorithm
A risk management framework
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6149416 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Frank Bannister (0000-0003-3673-0374, Trinity College Dublin, autor correspondente), Robert Connolly (0000-0003-3196-2889, Dublin City University), Regina Connolly (Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland) |
| Editores | Sarah Giest (0000-0001-8201-6943), Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen (0000-0002-1553-6065) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 471-490 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Information Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255 |
| Editora | IOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.3233/ip-200249 |
| OpenAlex | W3112426303 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 32 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
Algorithmic decision-making is neither a recent phenomenon nor one necessarily associated with artificial intelligence (AI), though advances in AI are increasingly resulting in what were heretofore human decisions being taken over by, or becoming dependent on, algorithms and technologies like machine learning. Such developments promise many potential benefits, but are not without certain risks. These risks are not always well understood. It is not just a question of machines making mistakes; it is the embedding of values, biases and prejudices in software which can discriminate against both individuals and groups in society. Such biases are often hard either to detect or prove, particularly where there are problems with transparency and accountability and where such systems are outsourced to the private sector. Consequently, being able to detect and categorise these risks is essential in order to develop a systematic and calibrated response. This paper proposes a simple taxonomy of decision-making algorithms in the public sector and uses this to build a risk management framework with a number of components including an accountability structure and regulatory governance. This framework is designed to assist scholars and practitioners interested in ensuring structured accountability and legal regulation of AI in the public sphere
Accountability · Business · Computer security · Corporate governance · Economics · Management science · Order (exchange · Political science · Private sector · Public sector · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk management · Taxonomy (biology · Transparency (behavior · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance
The different roles of algorithms in research on governmental decision-making for citizen services
Prospects and Challenges of Future AI-Enabled Government
AI adoption in Thailand's e-government services
Information Polity publishes more than strong empirical studies
The complexities of digitization and street-level discretion
Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations
Algorithmic Transparency and Citizen Trust in Digital Governance
Algorithmic Governance and the Banality of Evil
How Should Public Administrations Foster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI
Machine Intelligence, Bureaucracy, and Human Control
Legitimacy of Algorithmic Decision-Making
Understanding the Impact of Generation Z on Risk Management—A Preliminary Views on Values, Competencies, and Ethics of the Generation Z in Public Administration
Algorithmic policing accountability
Policy initiatives for Artificial Intelligence-enabled government
Regulating generative AI
Creating a workforce of fatigued cynics? A randomized controlled trial of implementing an algorithmic decision-making support tool
Public value positions and design preferences toward AI-based chatbots in e-government. Evidence from a conjoint experiment with citizens and municipal front desk officers
A matter of perspective
Structuring the scattered literature on algorithmic profiling in the case of unemployment through a systematic literature review
Just like I thought’
How Do Algorithmic Decision‐Making Systems Used in Public Benefits Determinations Fail? Insights From Legal Challenges
AI, Bureaucracy, and Institutional Ethics
Research on digital discretion-The subjectification of street-level work in public administration
Citizens’ trust in AI-enabled government systems
Screen-level bureaucrats in the age of algorithms
Citizens’ attitudes towards automated decision-making
Introduction to special issue algorithmic transparency in government
How professionals respond to the disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction
Evolving AI policy and the public administrator
Automated, administrative decision‐making and good governance
Bringing all clients into the system – Professional digital discretion to enhance inclusion when services are automated
A critical analysis of the study of gender and technology in government
Constructing a Data‐Driven Society
Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey
The second wave of digital-era governance
The Trouble with Transparency
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Opening the government’s black boxes
Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes
Seeing without knowing
Illusions of Accountability
Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust
Knowing public services
| Obras citantes distintas | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 5,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 32 |