Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Themes and Topics in Parliamentary Oversight Hearings

A New Direction in Textual Data Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID6170171
AuthorsJ E Sanders (0000-0002-9523-2044, Government of the United Kingdom), Giulio Lisi (Government of the United Kingdom), Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey (0000-0002-7820-6231, Government of the United Kingdom, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume8
Issue2
Pages153-194
Publication date2017-12-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStatistics Politics and Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2151-7509 • E-ISSN: 2194-6299
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/spp-2017-0012
OpenAlexW2799335901
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited21

This paper contributes to the growing empirical work on deliberation in legislatures by proposing a novel approach to analysing parliamentary hearings using both thematic and topic modelling textual analysis software. We explore variations in deliberative quality across economic policy type (fiscal policy, monetary policy and financial stability) and across parliamentary chambers (Commons and Lords) in UK select committee oversight hearings during the 2010–2015 Parliament. Our overall focus is not only to suggest a multi-method approach to the textual analysis of parliamentary data, but also to explore more substantive aspects of parliamentary oversight, such as: (1) the extent to which oversight varies between unelected and elected policy makers; and (2) whether parliamentarians conduct oversight more forcefully or more along partisan lines when they are challenging fellow politicians as opposed to central bank officials. Our findings suggest consistent differences in deliberative styles between types of hearings (fiscal, monetary, financial stability) and between chambers (Commons, Lords

Commons · Deliberation · House of Commons · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • What is wellbeing for rural South African women? Textual analysis of focus group discussion transcripts and implications for programme design and evaluation

    Open Access•Giulia Ferrari•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

  • Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings

    Open Access•Nicolò Fraccaroli, Alessandro Giovannini et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • De-Democratizing the Public Sphere – A Structural Topic Model Analysis of Hungarian Parliamentary Discourses Between 1998-2020

    Open Access•D Sik, Zsófia Rakovics et al.•Problems of Post-Communism•2026

  • Does Victim Gender Matter for Justice Delivery? Police and Judicial Responses to Women’s Cases in India

    Open Access•Nirvikar Jassal•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Local voters have their reasons. Mapping voting motives in local elections in Belgium

    Open Access•Jérémy Dodeigne, Min Reuchamps et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2022

  • Topicmodels

    Open Access•Bettina Grün, Kurt Hornik•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • A correlated topic model of Science

    David M Blei, John D Lafferty•The Annals of Applied Statistics•2007

  • Probabilistic topic models

    Open Access•David M Blei•Communications of the ACM•2012

  • Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•André Bächtiger, Shirley Niemeyer et al.•Journal of Political Philosophy•2009

  • Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses

    Open Access•Miguel E Roberts, Margaret E Roberts et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science

    Open Access•Andréa Bäuchtiger, Dominik Hangartner•Political Studies•2010

  • Text as Data

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer, Brandon M Stewart et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer•Political Analysis•2010

  • Democratic Deliberation Within

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2000

  • Congressional Oversight Hearings and Policy Control

    Open Access•Robert J Mcgrath•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • The Costs of Control

    Open Access•John D Huber, Charles R Shipan•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • The Accountability Cube

    Gijs Jan Brandsma, Thomas Schillemans•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts

    Michael Laver, John Garry•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs

    Open Access•Kevin M Quinn, Burt L Monroe et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Measuring Ideas More Effectively

    Open Access•Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey•PS Political Science & Politics•2005

  • Political Control Versus Expertise

    Open Access•Kathleen Bawn•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data

    Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit et al.•American Political Science Review•2003

  • How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions

    Open Access•Jason Barabas•American Political Science Review•2004

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae