Kangaku and the State
Colonial Collaboration between Korean and Japanese Traditional Sinologists
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6171138 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yong-Beom Lee (Pusan National University, corresponding author), Yongbeom Lee |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 235-256 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2586-0380 • E-ISSN: 1598-2661 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/15982661-11361761 |
| OpenAlex | W4404581903 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
This article examines the response of kangaku 漢学, or traditional sinological study, to modernity in Japan and colonial Korea by focusing on institutionalization and the interactions between scholars of traditional sinology in Japan and colonized Korea. In the Japanese Empire, kangaku actively demonstrated that it could contribute to the nation-state and became a part of the modern educational system, including the Imperial University. The favorable atmosphere toward kangaku in the Japanese Empire also enabled the institutionalization of kangaku in colonial Korea. The process of institutionalization there was deeply influenced by the traditional network of Japanese sinologists. Traditional sinologists in Japan and colonial Korea were able to cooperate based on a shared “shibun (斯文 “This Culture of Ours”) consciousness,” a kind of consciousness of crisis that originated in the Analects. The shibun consciousness was rooted in the traditional literary world, where borders and contemporaneity were relatively ambiguous. Within the university system, kangaku gradually faced the pressure of specialization and elaboration of modern scholarship and the demands of the nation-state. Thus, successive generations of Korean and Japanese sinologists moved toward a new modern ideology that went beyond “shibun consciousness
Ancient history · China · Colonialism · Consciousness · Economics · Economy · Empire · Ideology · Institutionalisation · Modernity · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sinology · Sociology · State (computer science · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|