From Individual Judge to Judicial Bureaucracy
The Emergence of Judicial Councils and the Changing Nature of Judicial Accountability in Court Administration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6173842 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tin Bunjevac (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | University of New South Wales Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-0096 • E-ISSN: 1839-2881 |
| Publisher | University of New South Wales Law Journal (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.53637/lrpz2542 |
| OpenAlex | W2599440276 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Over the last 20 years, courts in Australia and many developed countries have experienced an exponential increase in the number and complexity of cases coming before them, which was also accompanied by increasing public expectations regarding the cost, timeliness, quality and accessibility of justice. Judges have found themselves under increasing pressure from politicians, prosecutors, lawyers, the media and other stakeholders to share the burden of cost-cutting in the public sector and deliver more justice in less time and for less money
Accountability · Administration (probate law · Bureaucracy · Business · Economic Justice · Judicial activism · Judicial review · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Quality (philosophy · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.71 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2023 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |