The politics of implementation of the judicial council model in Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7771972 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pablo José Castillo Ortiz (0000-0003-4540-1855, University of Sheffield, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 503-520 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-7739 • E-ISSN: 1755-7747 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1755773919000298 |
| OpenAlex | W2991175667 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 23 |
Currently, at least three approaches to judicial governance coexist in the European continent: the judicial council model, the courts service model, and the Ministry of Justice model. Although doctrinal and case-specific literatures abound on this topic, examples of cross-country studies explaining choices on these models of judicial governance are rather scarce. More particularly, we lack so far knowledge on how different factors interact in leading to the implementation of the judicial council model. This is striking, given the importance of judicial councils for the operation of the rule of law. Furthermore, explanations on the choices of models of judicial governance are essential to understanding the intricate issue of the political rationalities underlying macrolevel design of judicial institutions. Using qualitative comparative analysis and focusing on European liberal democracies, this article contributes to the literature in the field. It is shown that judicial councils are created when postauthoritarian countries implement new constitutions either in romanistic law countries or in countries subject to Europeanizing pressures
Corporate governance · Economic Justice · Economics · Judicial activism · Judicial discretion · Judicial Independence · Judicial review · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Poland's Constitutional Breakdown
Comparative Research Design
Illiberalism Within
Qualitative Comparative Analysis using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach
Configurational Comparative Methods
Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences
The Many Faces of Europeanization
The Assault on Postcommunist Courts
The Power Knocks at the Courts' Back Door
From Individual Judge to Judicial Bureaucracy
On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins
Guarding the Guardians
Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |