Empty Rituals or Workable Models? Towards a Business and Human Rights Treaty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6173978 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jolyon Ford (0000-0003-2356-2420), Claire Methven O’brien (0000-0002-3225-7033, Australian National University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | University of New South Wales Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0313-0096 • E-ISSN: 1839-2881 |
| Publisher | University of New South Wales Law Journal (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.53637/nwln3879 |
| OpenAlex | W4254913398 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
Within the still-emerging field of business and human rights (‘BHR’), the question of whether a treaty is required in order meaningfully to address BHR ‘governance gaps’ is one that is attracting renewed advocacy, commentary and diplomatic activity. By contrast, when the United Nations (‘UN’) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (‘UNGPs’) were first adopted in 2011, the balance of opinion amongst duty-bearers appears to have been that this issue should be set aside
Aside · Balance (ability · Business · Corporate governance · Duty · Duty of care · Economics · Human rights · Law and economics · Management · Order (exchange · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Sociology · Treaty · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Human Rights and Development · Law
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |