Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Whose Party is It

Lame Ducks, Presidential Candidates, and Evaluations of the Party

Bibliographic Data

ID6179880
AuthorsJames Sievert (0000-0002-7937-7024, Texas Tech University, corresponding author), Victor J Hinojosa (0000-0003-1938-4211, Texas Tech University), Victor Hinojosa
Year2022
Volume50
Issue4
Pages539-544
Publication date2022-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x221076435
OpenAlexW4212786155
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited14

Presidents and presidential candidates serve as an important source cue for the mass public’s attitudes toward and evaluations of the political parties. Our study evaluates these dynamics during the transition from a lame duck president, Barack Obama, to a new party standard-bearer, Hillary Clinton. Our analysis takes advantage of the fact that the 2014 and 2016 Cooperative Election Study (CES) and the 2012 and 2016 American National Election Study (ANES) surveys asked respondents to evaluate both Obama, Clinton, and the Democratic Party. These data allow us to examine whether the transition from Obama to Clinton changed the primary referent for public attitudes toward the Democratic Party. Our results provide mixed evidence about a change in the relative importance of attitudes toward Clinton and Obama when the former became the nominee, and the latter was a lame duck. While the public’s view of the connection between Obama and Democratic Party’s ideological profile remained constant across time, respondents did update their affective assessments of the party in the face of a new party leader once Clinton was the nominee

Communism · Democracy · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Politics of the United States · Presidential election · Presidential system · Primary election · Realigning election · Socialism · Sociology · Split-ticket voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics

  • Succession effects in presidential elections

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Cohen•Electoral Studies•2023

  • The President's Influence on Congressional Candidate Evaluations

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, James Sievert et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • How National Cues Polarize Perceptions of Political Figures

    Open Access•James Sievert, Joel Sievert et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • Who Gets Blamed When Congress and the President Collide

    Ryan D Williamson, James Sievert•Congress & the Presidency•2024

  • Assessing Trump's presidential endorsements while in and out of office (2018-2022)

    Open Access•Michael Heseltine•Electoral Studies•2023

  • Identity Crisis

    Open Access•Josh Sides, John Sides et al.•Identity crisis•2019

  • Post-Racial or Most-Racial

    M Tesler•Post-Racial or Most-Racial?•2015

  • A Uniter and a Divider

    Open Access•Corwin D Smidt•American Politics Research•2019

  • Traiting Places

    Open Access•Christopher Stout, Christopher T Stout et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Nationalization in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•James Sievert, Joel Sievert et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008–2012

    Open Access•Mary Mcthomas, M Tesler•Politics & Gender•2016

  • The Macro-dynamics of Partisan Advantage

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Matthew Tarpey et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval

    Open Access•Ellen M Key, Kathleen Donovan et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•Party Politics•2009

  • Polarizing Cues

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Arguing for a Negligible Effect

    Open Access•Carlisle Rainey•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Emotions and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•B Mclaughlin, Derrick Holland et al.•American Politics Research•2020

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae