Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Institutional design and legislative conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID6180760
AuthorsJoel M Ostrow (0000-0003-3564-0238, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume29
Issue4
Pages413-433
Publication date1996-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunist and Post-Communist Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0967-067X • E-ISSN: 1873-6920
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1016/s0967-067x(96)80024-9
OpenAlexW2030525260
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

This article develops a comparative institutional framework for evaluating the new legislatures of the former Soviet Union, and demonstrates that the conventional wisdom about the Russian Federation Supreme Soviet is wrong. It was not a totalitarian, Soviet institution whose omnipotent and malevolent Chair singlehandedly dominated policy outputs and controlled the membership. Rather, the Supreme Soviet's non-partisan, committee-centered design enabled the committees to dominate the legislative process and to virtually exclude conflict, even on such objectively contentious legislative issues as the annual budget. However, the non-partisan design denied the legislature the mechanisms for controlling the Chair on non-legislative, political issues, particularly in relations with the executive branch. On legislative issues, the Supreme Soviet was a well-oiled machine, but on political issues it was out of control, thus leading to the legislature's demise. This article demonstrates the utility of an institutional framework for comparing post-communist legislatures, and the necessity of disaggregating legislative and political issues when evaluating legislative performance

Communism · Demise · Institution · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Legislative protest as disruptive democratic practice

    Carole Spary•Democratization•2013

  • Electronic Resources and the Study of Political Elites in Russia

    Bettina Renz, Jonathan Sullivan•Europe Asia Studies•2013

  • Procedural breakdown and deadlock in the Russian State Duma

    Joel M Ostrow•Europe Asia Studies•1998

  • Elite Attitudes and Democratic Stability

    Vladimir Pigenko, Charles R Wise et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2002

  • Conflict-Management in Russia's Federal Institutions

    Joel M Ostrow•Post-Soviet Affairs•2002

  • Legislatures in comparative perspective

    Allan Kornberg•Legislatures in comparative…•1973

  • Planning and budgeting in poor countries

    Naomi Caiden•Planning and budgeting in poor…•1980

  • Congress and Money

    Open Access•Barry Bozeman, Allen Schick•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1982

  • Varieties of Post-Soviet Authoritarian Regimes

    Philip G Roeder•Post-Soviet Affairs•1994

  • Why are Congressional Committees Powerful

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall•American Political Science Review•1987

Citations per year0.18
Citation span1998 - 2013 (16)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae