Obama's Executive Branch Czars
The Constitutional Controversy and a Legislative Solution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6183029 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark J Rozell (George Mason University), Mitchel A Sollenberger (University of Michigan–Dearborn) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 74-99 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Congress & the Presidency (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07343469.2011.642057 |
| OpenAlex | W2094055225 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 9 |
The increasingly common practice of presidential appointment of so-called executive branch czars has become especially contentious in the Obama era. Much of that controversy unfortunately is highly partisan-oriented and misses the core constitutional issues at stake. In this article, we describe and analyze the Obama-era executive branch czars controversy from a constitutional analysis framework. In so doing, we offer a working definition of executive branch czars—a much-needed corrective to the current debates in which the term has been used very loosely. We examine and analyze the scope of authority exercised by the high-level executive branch officials during the Obama administration that we consider to be constitutionally troublesome. Although our focus is on the Obama czars that have vast and largely unchecked powers, we also acknowledge that some media-labeled czar positions are statutorily created and accountable and thus should not be in the same category. After addressing the Obama-era czars, we offer a set of reform proposals that provide a much-needed corrective
Administration (probate law · Constitutional law · Executive branch · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Scope (computer science · Separation of powers · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,23 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2015 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |