Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The World between Us

State Security and the Negotiation of Social Categories in Interwar Romania

Bibliographic Data

ID6185706
AuthorsGábor Egry (0000-0001-5584-8090, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume44
Issue1
Pages17-46
Publication date2017-06-23
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEast Central Europe (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0094-3037 • E-ISSN: 1876-3308
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/18763308-04401009
OpenAlexW2738890955
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited5

The concept of security and the security culture of the state are always social constructs reflecting the outcome of interactions between state and society. Key categories of security, like dangerous social groups and activities are usually negotiated through these interactions. Politicians, secret agents, gendarms, denunciators, journalists, or the indicted, all shape the broader social meaning in a dynamic way. While in Greater Romania the state attempted to extend its control to ever broader segments of society in order to fend off perceived threats it had to rely on its own personnel and on people who cooperated in this effort, creating room for maneuver for everyone involved in this process. Due to its scarce resources the state could not even control entirely its own representatives, who often pursued a personal agenda different from the state’s own goals. Irredentism, associated with ethnic minorities exemplifies this situation quite well. In an effort to preempt any threat from national minorities with a kin-state gradually led to the association of irredentism with ethnicity, without having control over the latter’s exact meaning. Thus, its practical application depended on a series of factors, personal and structural ones, that finally led to a confusion and to the emptying of the concept that was applied without consistency. It was exactly this development that reconstituted the gap between state and society that actively engaged each other in the resulting process of negotiation. Under the surface of the rule of law and against the backdrop of the image of an ever more powerful state security apparatus, state and society defined together those informal rules of everyday co-existence that were often meant to hide reality from the watchful eyes of Bucharest

Consistency (knowledge bases) · Ethnic group · Law and economics · Meaning (existential) · National security · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Computer Science · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Law · Polish Historical and Cultural Studies · Psychology

  • De l’ethnicisation de la nationalité à l’indigénat transnational

    Gábor Egry, Ildikó Józan•Revue d’Allemagne et des pays de…•2020

  • Nationalizing the multi-ethnic borderlands

    Berk Emek•Journal of Southeast European and…•2022

  • Sicherheitsgeschichte. Ein neues Feld der Geschichtswissenschaften

    Cornel Zwierlein•Geschichte und Gesellschaft•2012

  • Einführung

    Malte Rolf•Geschichte und Gesellschaft•2014

  • Securitization. Gegenwartsdiagnose oder historischer Analyseansatz

    Eckart Conze•Geschichte und Gesellschaft•2012

  • Diskussionsforum

    Ulrike Von Hirschhausen•Geschichte und Gesellschaft•2015

  • National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life

    T Edensor•National Identity, Popular…•2020

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2022 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae