A Nonpermanent Seat in the United Nations Security Council
Why Bother
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6189151 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ann-Marie Ekengren (1 University of Gothenburg Department of Political Science Sweden), Ann‐marie Ekengren (0000-0002-9976-622X, University of Gothenburg), Fredrik D Hjorthen (0000-0002-8774-6889, 2 University of Oslo Department of Political Science Norway), Ulrika Möller (0000-0002-6879-9563, 1 University of Gothenburg Department of Political Science Sweden) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-45 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-2846 • E-ISSN: 1942-6720 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/19426720-02601007 |
| OpenAlex | W3015391942 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 28 |
This article contributes with a novel systematic theoretical and empirical exploration of why states find a nonpermanent seat in the UN Security Council attractive. Three conceptualizations of power—to influence, to network, and to gain status—guide the empirical analysis. A telephone interview survey with diplomatic staff at Member States’ permanent missions to the United Nations in New York provides readers with original and unique empirical knowledge of state perceptions of power. The candidature for a seat comes with expectations of influencing decision-making, despite modest estimations of the opportunity to have impact. Opportunities to network and to gain status are not frequent reasons for a candidature. Diplomats’ estimations are nevertheless higher on the opportunity to actually establish relevant relationships and to gain status brought by a seat
Business · Empirical research · European union · International law · International relations · International trade · Member state · Member states · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Security council · Sociology · Telephone survey · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology · Public Administration · Marketing
Digital Celebrity Diplomacy in the UN Security Council Elections
Examining E10 Strategies and Decisions
Status Orders
Domestic Debate and International Office
Power and Diplomacy in the United Nations Security Council
Finland’s Status-updating through the UN Human Rights Council Campaign
A Small State’s Campaign to Get Elected to the UNSC
Campaigning for the Prize
The United Nations After 75
Speech is silver, resolutions are gold
The production and performance of status
Leveraging Influence on the UN Security Council
Drivers of differentiation between EU Member‐states in the UN General Assembly
The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council
National Interests in International Society
Identity, Interest and Action
Curb your enthusiasm
Respect and disrespect in international politics
Three concepts of recognition
For Diplomacy
Myths of Membership
United Nations Security Council Reform
Development aid and international politics
The state as person in international theory
The determinants of election to the United Nations Security Council
How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations
The Recognition Game
The Pernicious Consequences of UN Security Council Membership
The Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy
Africa and United Nations Elections
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Elections Within the United Nations
Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council
Can Elected Members Make a Difference in the UN Security Council? Australia’s Experience in 2013–2014
Eyes on the Prize
The purpose of United Nations Security Council practice
Power in practice
Power in International Politics
Power, Status, and International War
A Structural Theory of Aggression
Power and Interdependence in the Information Age
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |